Microplastics removal efficiency and risk analysis of wastewater treatment plants in Oman

被引：7
作者：
Al-Amri A. [1 ]
Yavari Z. [1 ]
Reza Nikoo M. [1 ]
Karimi M. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat
[2] School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham
来源：
Chemosphere | 2024年 / 359卷
关键词：
Emerging pollutants; Microplastics; Plastic polymers; PROMETHEE method; Wastewater treatment technologies;
D O I：
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142206
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Microplastics (MPs) have recently been documented as an emerging pollutant that poses a critical threat to environment. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are commonly regarded as significant contributors to the presence of MPs. This study aimed to assess the MPs load of three wastewater treatment facilities in Oman using various treatments, including MBR, SBR, and CAS. Wastewater samples from influent, effluent, and sludge were collected and analyzed to determine the concentration, morphology, size, color, and polymer type of the MPs. A set of sieves with a mesh size range of 1 mm–45 μm was used to for filtration. Oxidation treatment was applied for all samples using Fenton's reagent, followed by density separation by sodium chloride solution. The Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR- FTIR) method was utilized to test 10% from each sampling point to confirm the polymer types of the MPs. The pollution load index (PLI) and hazard index (HI) have been employed to assess the risk associated with the chemical toxicity and concentration of detected particles. The PROMETHEE method was used to rank the risk of sampling sites based on different criteria that posed potential ecological and human health risks. The results indicate that the average concentrations of 0.99 MP/L, 1.38 MP/L, and 0.93 MP/L were detected in the final treated effluent of WWTP A, WWTP B, and WWTP C, respectively. These concentrations correspond to overall removal efficiencies of 82.5%, 77.4%, and 79.2% for WWTP A, WWTP B, and WWTP C, respectively Most MPs found in tertiary effluent were smaller particles (425 μm) and fiber-shaped. The major types of MPs were polypropylene (PP), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polyurethane (PU), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and Polyvinyl chloride (PVC). This study showed that treated effluent and sludge release significant MPs into the environment. © 2024
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Alavian Petroody S.S., Hashemi S.H., van Gestel C.A.M., Factors affecting microplastic retention and emission by a wastewater treatment plant on the southern coast of Caspian Sea, Chemosphere, 261, (2020)
  • [2] Ambrosini R., Azzoni R.S., Pittino F., Diolaiuti G., Franzetti A., Parolini M., First evidence of microplastic contamination in the supraglacial debris of an alpine glacier, Environ. Pollut., 253, pp. 297-301, (2019)
  • [3] Athey S.N., Albotra S.D., Gordon C.A., Monteleone B., Seaton P., Andrady A.L., Taylor A.R., Brander S.M., Trophic transfer of microplastics in an estuarine food chain and the effects of a sorbed legacy pollutant, Limnology and Oceanography Letters, pp. 154-162, (2020)
  • [4] Bakir A., Rowland S.J., Thompson R.C., Competitive sorption of persistent organic pollutants onto microplastics in the marine environment, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 64, 12, pp. 2782-2789, (2012)
  • [5] Cai Y., Wu J., Lu J., Wang J., Zhang C., Fate of microplastics in a coastal wastewater treatment plant: microfibers could partially break through the integrated membrane system, Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 16, 7, (2022)
  • [6] Carr S.A., Liu J., Tesoro A.G., Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants, Water Res., 91, pp. 174-182, (2016)
  • [7] Cole M., Webb H., Lindeque P.K., Fileman E.S., Halsband C., Galloway T.S., Isolation of microplastics in biota-rich seawater samples and marine organisms, Sci. Rep., 4, (2014)
  • [8] Eerkes-Medrano D., Thompson R.C., Aldridge D.C., Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs. In, Water Research, 75, pp. 63-82, (2015)
  • [9] Franco A.A., Arellano J.M., Albendin G., Rodriguez-Barroso R., Quiroga J.M., Coello M.D., Microplastic pollution in wastewater treatment plants in the city of Cádiz: abundance, removal efficiency and presence in receiving water body, Sci. Total Environ., 776, (2021)
  • [10] Ivleva N.P., Wiesheu A.C., Niessner R., Microplastic in aquatic ecosystems, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 56, 7, pp. 1720-1739, (2017)
1234