Validity of Wearable Gait Analysis System for Measuring Lower-Limb Kinematics during Timed Up and Go Test

被引:0
作者
Kataoka, Yoshiaki [1 ,2 ]
Ishida, Tomoya [1 ]
Osuka, Satoshi [1 ]
Takeda, Ryo [3 ]
Tadano, Shigeru [1 ]
Yamada, Satoshi [3 ]
Tohyama, Harukazu [1 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sapporo 0600812, Japan
[2] Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Rehabil, Hokkaido Hosp, Sapporo 0028072, Japan
[3] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Engn, Sapporo 0608628, Japan
关键词
timed up and go test; wearable sensor; kinematics; motion analysis; validation; UP-AND-GO; ACCELERATION; PARAMETERS; STROKE; ADULTS; FALLS;
D O I
10.3390/s24196296
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Few studies have reported on the validity of a sensor-based lower-limb kinematics evaluation during the timed up and go (TUG) test. This study aimed to determine the validity of a wearable gait sensor system for measuring lower-limb kinematics during the TUG test. Ten young healthy participants were enrolled, and lower-limb kinematics during the TUG test were assessed using a wearable gait sensor system and a standard optical motion analysis system. The angular velocities of the hip, knee, and ankle joints in sit-to-stand and turn-to-sit phases were significantly correlated between the two motion analysis systems (R = 0.612-0.937). The peak angles and ranges of motion of hip, knee, and ankle joints in the walking-out and walking-in phases were also correlated in both systems (R = 0.528-0.924). These results indicate that the wearable gait sensor system is useful for evaluating lower-limb kinematics not only during gait, but also during the TUG test.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] A Wearable Magneto-Inertial System for Gait Analysis (H-Gait): Validation on Normal Weight and Overweight/Obese Young Healthy Adults
    Agostini, Valentina
    Gastaldi, Laura
    Rosso, Valeria
    Knaflitz, Marco
    Tadano, Shigeru
    [J]. SENSORS, 2017, 17 (10)
  • [2] Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes
    Aminian, K
    Najafi, B
    Büla, C
    Leyvraz, PF
    Robert, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 35 (05) : 689 - 699
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, 2020 Topics Objectives: Nutrition and Weight Status
  • [4] Convergent Validity of a Wearable Sensor System for Measuring Sub-Task Performance during the Timed Up-and-Go Test
    Beyea, James
    McGibbon, Chris A.
    Sexton, Andrew
    Noble, Jeremy
    O'Connell, Colleen
    [J]. SENSORS, 2017, 17 (04)
  • [5] Timed Up and Go test: Comparison of kinematics between patients with chronic stroke and healthy subjects
    Bonnyaud, Celine
    Pradon, Didier
    Vaugier, Isabelle
    Vuillerme, Nicolas
    Bensmail, Djamel
    Roche, Nicolas
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2016, 49 : 258 - 263
  • [6] Evaluation of an inertial sensor system for analysis of timed-up-and-go under dual-task demands
    Coulthard, Jason T.
    Treen, Tanner T.
    Oates, Alison R.
    Lanovaz, Joel L.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 41 (04) : 882 - 887
  • [7] Multi-parametric evaluation of sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transitions in elderly people
    Ganea, R.
    Paraschiv-Ionescu, A.
    Buela, C.
    Rochat, S.
    Aminian, K.
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2011, 33 (09) : 1086 - 1093
  • [8] Kinematic analysis of motor strategies in frail aged adults during the Timed Up and Go: how to spot the motor frailty?
    Hassani, Asma
    Kubicki, Alexandre
    Brost, Vincent
    Mourey, France
    Yang, Fan
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2015, 10 : 505 - 513
  • [9] Quantitative evaluation of movement using the timed up-and-go test
    Higashi, Yuji
    Yamakoshi, Kenichi
    Fujimoto, Toshiro
    Sekine, Masaki
    Tamura, Toshiyo
    [J]. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2008, 27 (04): : 38 - 46
  • [10] Kinematics of Turning 180° During the Timed Up and Go in Stroke Survivors With and Without Falls History
    Hollands, Kristen Leigh
    Hollands, Mark Andrew
    Zietz, Doerte
    Wing, Alan Miles
    Wright, Christine
    van Vliet, Paulette
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2010, 24 (04) : 358 - 367