A Utilization of Advanced Aerospace Engineering Technology in Medical Endoscopy

被引：0

作者：

Kim S. ^{[1
,2
]}

Kim M. ^{[3
,4
]}

Lee C. ^{[3
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University, College of Medicine

[2] Artifcial Intelligence Institute, Seoul National University

[3] Electro-Medical Equipment Research Division, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute

[4] Research and Development Division, MedInTech Inc

来源：

Journal of Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems | 2024年 / 30卷 / 04期

关键词：

artificial intelligence; flexible endoscope; fly-by-wire (FBW); hands on throttle and stick (HOTAS); robotic endoscope; surgical robot system;

D O I：

10.5302/J.ICROS.2024.24.0018

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The incorporation of aerospace engineering technologies into healthcare holds immense promise for advancing patient care. One notable example is the adoption of fly-by-wire (FBW) and hands-on-throttle-and-stick (HOTAS) technology, which were originally designed for aircraft control systems, to medical equipment manipulation. The transition from mechanical to electrical systems has markedly enhanced precision and responsiveness in delicate medical procedures. This integration of aerospace and medical technologies, as seen in surgical robotics and robotic-assisted endoscopic systems, provides better precision and safety than conventional methods. Moreover, the integration of aerospace engineering principles with artificial intelligence (AI) has further revolutionized healthcare. This paper aims to explore these innovative applications and their implications for the future of medicine. © ICROS 2024.

引用

页码：438 / 447

页数：9

共 36 条

[1]

Pahwa M., Pahwa A.R., Girotra M., Abrahm R.R., Kathuria S., Sharma A., Defining the pros and cons of open, conventional laparoscopy, and robot-assisted pyeloplasty in a developing nation, Advances in Urology, (2014)

[2]

Lee C., Park W.J., Kim M., Noh S., Yoon C., Lee C., Kim Y., Kim H.H., Kim H.C., Kim S., Pneumatic-type surgical robot end-effector for laparoscopic surgical-oper-ation-by-wire, Biomedical Engineering Online, 13, (2014)

[3]

Kang B.H., Xuan Y., Hur H., Ahn C.W., Cho Y.K., Han S.-U., Comparison of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The learning curve of robotic surgery, Journal of Gastric Cancer, 12, 3, pp. 156-163, (2012)

[4]

Sung G.T., Gill I.S., Robotic laparoscopic surgery: A comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems, Urology, 59, 6, pp. 893-898, (2001)

[5]

Corcione F., Esposito C., Cuccurullo D., Settembre A., Miranda N., Amato F., Pirozzi F., Caiazzo P., Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: Preliminary experience, Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 19, pp. 117-119, (2004)

[6]

Lanfranco A.R., Castellanos A.E., Desai J.P., Meyers W.C., Robotic surgery: A current perspective, Annals of Surgery, 239, 1, pp. 14-21, (2004)

[7]

Cheng L., Glozman D., Ma J., Kosari S.N., White L., Raven-II: An open platform for surgical robotics research, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 60, 4, pp. 954-959, (2012)

[8]

Heemskerk J., Bouvy N.D., Baeten C.G., The end of robot-assisted laparoscopy? A critical appraisal of scientific evidence on the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, Surgical Endoscopy, 28, pp. 1388-1398, (2013)

[9]

Sullivan M.J., Frost E.A., Lew M.W., Anesthetic care of the patient for robotic surgery, Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology, 19, 5, pp. 967-982, (2008)

[10]

The Da Vinci Surgery Experience

← 1 2 3 4 →