Environmental protection tax reform and corporate Climate Risk Disclosure

被引:0
|
作者
Cui, Xinghua [1 ]
Ding, Qiwei [1 ]
Yang, Ling [1 ]
Yu, Chaoyi [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
[2] Liaoning Univ, Sch Finance & Trade, Shenyang 110136, Liaoning, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental protection tax; Corporate Climate Risk Disclosure; Institutional investors; Difference-in-differences method; STAKEHOLDER THEORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143931
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The reform of the environmental protection tax (EPT), a crucial policy instrument for combating climate change, significantly influences corporate climate risk. Hence, a thorough examination of the connection between EPT and corporate climate risk disclosure (CRD) is essential for companies to better evaluate the risks and challenges they encounter. The findings of the research indicate: (1) EPT reform substantially boosts corporate CRD. (2) Mechanism tests demonstrate that EPT enhances corporate CRD via three pathways: increasing public environmental awareness, fostering green innovation, and improving total factor productivity. (3) Heterogeneity analysis shows that various factors such as micro-level corporate characteristics (ownership and corporate life cycle), industry features (high-tech industries and factor intensity), and macro-level aspects (urban location, size, and resource attributes) differentially affect the impact of EPT. (4) Additional analysis from the perspective of institutional investors indicates that a higher proportion of institutional investor holdings amplifies the positive effect of EPT on corporate CRD. These research conclusions aid in accurately assessing the CRD impact of EPT and provide empirical support for policy development and modification.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Is earnings management associated with corporate environmental disclosure? Evidence from Kuwaiti listed firms
    Gerged, Ali Meftah
    Al-Haddad, Lara Mohammad
    Al-Hajri, Meshari O.
    ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2020, 33 (01) : 167 - 185
  • [42] Stakeholder Power towards Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from Malaysia
    Hamzah, Noradiva
    Abdltllah, Maizatulakma
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, 10 : 1 - 10
  • [43] Environmental protection tax, management efficiency, and enterprise green technology innovation
    Zhou, Yang
    Su, Qian
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 75
  • [44] Price of going green: The employment effects of the environmental protection tax in China
    Lu, Shuling
    Yang, Qijing
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 87
  • [45] The Impact of China's Environmental Protection Tax on Regional Economic Effects
    Chenghao, Ye
    Mayburov, Igor A.
    Ying, Wang
    ECONOMY OF REGION, 2024, 20 (04) : 1315 - 1326
  • [46] Environmental protection tax and firms' ESG investment: Evidence from China
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Ye, Yingying
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2024, 131
  • [47] Optimization of the environmental protection tax system design based on artificial intelligence
    Zhang, Jing
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [48] Environmental Protection Tax and Green Innovation: The Mediating Role of Digitalization and ESG
    Cao, Guixiang
    She, Jinghuai
    Cao, Chengzi
    Cao, Qiuxiang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [49] Environmental Protection Tax and China's Economic Growth: Boost or Slowdown?
    Zhao, Qing
    Yuan, Chih-Hung
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (23)
  • [50] Corporate business strategy, CEO's managerial ability, and environmental disclosure: The perspective of stakeholder theory
    Cahyono, Suham
    Harymawan, Iman
    Djajadikerta, Hadrian Geri
    Noman, Abu Hanifa Md.
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 33 (08) : 8149 - 8189