Environmental protection tax reform and corporate Climate Risk Disclosure

被引:0
|
作者
Cui, Xinghua [1 ]
Ding, Qiwei [1 ]
Yang, Ling [1 ]
Yu, Chaoyi [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
[2] Liaoning Univ, Sch Finance & Trade, Shenyang 110136, Liaoning, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental protection tax; Corporate Climate Risk Disclosure; Institutional investors; Difference-in-differences method; STAKEHOLDER THEORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143931
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The reform of the environmental protection tax (EPT), a crucial policy instrument for combating climate change, significantly influences corporate climate risk. Hence, a thorough examination of the connection between EPT and corporate climate risk disclosure (CRD) is essential for companies to better evaluate the risks and challenges they encounter. The findings of the research indicate: (1) EPT reform substantially boosts corporate CRD. (2) Mechanism tests demonstrate that EPT enhances corporate CRD via three pathways: increasing public environmental awareness, fostering green innovation, and improving total factor productivity. (3) Heterogeneity analysis shows that various factors such as micro-level corporate characteristics (ownership and corporate life cycle), industry features (high-tech industries and factor intensity), and macro-level aspects (urban location, size, and resource attributes) differentially affect the impact of EPT. (4) Additional analysis from the perspective of institutional investors indicates that a higher proportion of institutional investor holdings amplifies the positive effect of EPT on corporate CRD. These research conclusions aid in accurately assessing the CRD impact of EPT and provide empirical support for policy development and modification.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management's Perceptions with Reality
    Denis Cormier
    Irene M. Gordon
    Michel Magnan
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2004, 49 : 143 - 165
  • [22] Determinants of Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure (CSED): In Jordanian context
    Bani-Khalid, Tareq
    Kouhy, Reza
    Hassan, Aminu
    VISION 2020: INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY, AND COMPETITIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2016, VOLS I - VII, 2016, : 3123 - 3148
  • [23] Corporate income tax reform and intra-industry resource reallocation
    Chen, Jin
    Li, Meimei
    Sun, Churen
    Xiong, Yao
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024,
  • [24] Do Fiscal Environmental Protection Expenditures Crowd Out Corporate Environmental Protection Investments?
    Hong, Yaoxiaoxue
    Jiang, Xianling
    Shi, Beibei
    Yu, Chang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [25] Environmental protection tax, green innovation, and environmental, social, and governance performance
    Wang, Jia
    Zhang, Shuying
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 65
  • [26] Corporate Environmental Disclosure in India: An Analysis of Multinational and Domestic Agrochemical Corporations
    Jessop, Anna
    Wilson, Nicole
    Bardecki, Michal
    Searcy, Cory
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (18)
  • [27] The impact of corporate ownership structure on corporate risk disclosure: evidence from an emerging economy
    Alshirah, Malek
    Alshira'h, Ahmad
    COMPETITIVENESS REVIEW, 2024, 34 (02) : 370 - 395
  • [28] Can green investors improve the quality of corporate environmental information disclosure?
    Cheng, Huifang
    Cao, An
    Hong, Chenxiang
    Liu, Dengao
    Wang, Mengying
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2025, 98
  • [29] Integrating theories for insight: corporate governance and environmental disclosure practices in the UAE
    Masoud, Najeb
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [30] Impact of the environmental protection tax on household welfare in Vietnam
    Quynh, Hoa Nguyen
    Quoc, Dung Ngo
    Ngoc, Toan Pham
    Thu, Lien Nguyen Thi
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 11 (02):