Prediction model for the compressive strength of rock based on stacking ensemble learning and shapley additive explanations

被引:9
作者
Wu, Luyuan [1 ]
Li, Jianhui [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jianwei [1 ]
Wang, Zifa [3 ]
Tong, Jingbo [1 ]
Ding, Fei [1 ]
Li, Meng [1 ]
Feng, Yi [4 ]
Li, Hui [4 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Municipal Construction Grp Co Ltd, Beijing 100045, Peoples R China
[3] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Engn Mech, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[4] China Railway First Survey & Design Inst Grp Co Lt, Xian 710043, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rock compressive strength; Stcaking ensemble learning; Machine learning; Bayesian optimization; Shapley additive explanations; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10064-024-03896-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurately predicting the compressive strength of rock (RCS) is crucial for the construction and maintenance of rock engineering. However, RCS prediction based on single machine learning (ML) algorithms often face issues such as parameter sensitivity and inadequate generalization. To address these challenges, a new (RCS) prediction model based on a stacking ensemble learning method was proposed. This method combines multiple ML algorithms to achieve more accurate and stable prediction results. Firstly, 442 sets of rock mechanics experimental data were collected to form the prediction dataset, and data preprocessing techniques, including missing value imputation and normalization, were applied for data cleaning and standardization. Secondly, nine classic ML algorithms were used to establish RCS prediction models, and the optimal configurations were determined using k-fold cross-validation and Bayesian optimization. The selected base learners were LightGBM, Random Forest, and XGBoost, and the meta-learners were Ridge, Lasso, and Linear Regression. Finally, the models were verified using the testset, and the comparison showed that the proposed stacking models were better than all single models. Notably, the Stacking-LR model exhibited the best predictive accuracy(R2=0.946, MAE=5.59, MAPE=9.94%). Furthermore, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was introduced to analyze the impact and dependencies of input features on the prediction results. It was found that both Young's modulus and confining pressure are the most critical parameters influencing RCS and exert a positive impact on the prediction results. This finding is consistent with domain expert knowledge, enhances the model's interpretability, and provides robust support for the predicted results.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   A hybridized intelligence model to improve the predictability level of strength index parameters of rocks [J].
Abbaszadeh Shahri, Abbas ;
Asheghi, Reza ;
Khorsand Zak, Mohammad .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2021, 33 (08) :3841-3854
[2]   Machine learning for prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength within carbonate rocks [J].
Abdelhedi, Mohamed ;
Jabbar, Rateb ;
Ben Said, Ahmed ;
Fetais, Noora ;
Abbes, Chedly .
EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2023, 16 (2) :1473-1487
[3]   Elastic modulus estimation of weak rock samples using random forest technique [J].
Abdi, Yasin ;
Momeni, Ehsan ;
Armaghani, Danial Jahed .
BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 82 (05)
[4]   Evaluating the Effects of Mineral Grain Size and Mineralogical Composition on the Correlated Equations Between Strength and Schmidt Hardness of Granitic Rocks [J].
Ajalloeian, Rassoul ;
Jamshidi, Amin ;
Khorasani, Reza .
GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 42 (01) :675-685
[5]   Prediction of rapid chloride penetration resistance of metakaolin based high strength concrete using light GBM and XGBoost models by incorporating SHAP analysis [J].
Alabdullah, Anas Abdulalim ;
Iqbal, Mudassir ;
Zahid, Muhammad ;
Khan, Kaffayatullah ;
Amin, Muhammad Nasir ;
Jalal, Fazal E. .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2022, 345
[6]   Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of granite through an expert artificial neural network [J].
Armaghani, Danial Jahed ;
Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam ;
Momeni, Ehsan ;
Monjezi, Masoud ;
Narayanasamy, Mogana Sundaram .
ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2016, 9 (01) :1-16
[7]   Soft computing based closed form equations correlating L and N-type Schmidt hammer rebound numbers of rocks [J].
Asteris, Panagiotis G. ;
Mamou, Anna ;
Hajihassani, Mohsen ;
Hasanipanah, Mahdi ;
Koopialipoor, Mohammadreza ;
Tien-Thinh Le ;
Kardani, Navid ;
Armaghani, Danial J. .
TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2021, 29
[8]   Evaluation of the new dynamic needle penetrometer in estimating uniaxial compressive strength of weak rocks [J].
Azadan, Pedram ;
Ahangari, Kaveh .
ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2014, 7 (08) :3205-3216
[9]   Application of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering: A state-of-the-art review [J].
Baghbani, Abolfazl ;
Choudhury, Tanveer ;
Costa, Susanga ;
Reiner, Johannes .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2022, 228
[10]   Explainable machine learning model for prediction of ground motion parameters with uncertainty quantification [J].
Chen Meng ;
Wang Hua .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2022, 65 (09) :3386-3404