Training responsible engineers. Phronesis and the role of virtues in teaching engineering ethics

被引:10
作者
Frigo G. [1 ]
Marthaler F. [2 ]
Albers A. [2 ]
Ott S. [2 ]
Hillerbrand R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe
[2] Institute of Product Engineering (IPEK), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe
关键词
engineering ethics; innovation; integrated product development; Phronesis; uncertainty; virtues;
D O I
10.1080/22054952.2021.1889086
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Engineering ethics courses aim to improve students’ ethical competence by developing skills such as ethical sensitivity, awareness, analysis and judgement. We present a type of virtue engineering ethics that bridges the gap between academic knowledge (in both ethics and engineering) and its application in engineering practice (particularly design). To clarify why learning about virtues can enrich students’ ethical thinking and competences, we specifically consider the virtue of practical wisdom, phronesis. At the core of the paper, we put forward a theoretical argument for including phronesis in teaching ethics within innovation courses. Training this virtue will help engineering students in dealing with the various uncertainties that will emerge from their future engineering practices. With regard to implementing our proposal, we suggest to integrate practical wisdom in ‘semi-technical’ courses that combine theoretical in-class learning and practical design experiences. We discuss the structure, aims and assessment methods of an integrated product development course that we deem preferable to and potentially more effective than stand-alone engineering ethics classes. An engineering virtue ethics can help engineering students develop a personal reflective way of thinking about concrete courses of action in engineering practice, and may have beneficial ripple effects on their lives, society and the environment. ©, Engineers Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 37
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs 2020-2021, (2019)
[2]  
Albers A., Burkardt N., Tobias D., Competence-profile Oriented Education with the Karlsruhe Education Model for Product Development (Kalep), World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 5, (2006)
[3]  
Beauchamp T., Childress J., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, (2012)
[4]  
Bowen W.R., Ethics and the Engineer: Developing the Basis of a Theological Approach, Studies in Christian Ethics, 23, 3, pp. 227-248, (2010)
[5]  
Brodeur D.R., Mentoring Young Adults in the Development of Social Responsibility, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 19, 1, pp. 13-25, (2013)
[6]  
Broome T.H., Peirce J., The Heroic Engineer, Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 1, pp. 51-55, (1997)
[7]  
Carbajal C., Chavez E., Trustworthiness and Integrity: Cardinal Virtues for Engineers, Latin American and Caribbean Journal of Engineering Education, 1, 1, (2007)
[8]  
Costello G.J., Aristotle’s Phronesis: Putting Some Meat on the Philosophy of Innovation, (2018)
[9]  
Costello G.J., The Philosophy of Innovation in Management Education: A Study Utilising Aristotle’s Concept of Phronesis, Philosophy of Management, 18, 3, pp. 215-230, (2019)
[10]  
Davis M., Engineering Ethics, Individuals, and Organizations, Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 2, pp. 223-231, (2006)