Waste-to-energy characterization and modeling: A case study at the us naval academy

被引:0
作者
Caton P.A. [1 ]
Schmidt J. [1 ]
Adsit C. [1 ]
Bermudez E. [1 ]
Chase C. [1 ]
Kerner T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, US Naval Academy, 590 Holloway Road, Annapolis, 21402, MD
来源
Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management | 2016年 / 42卷 / 02期
关键词
Chemical equilibrium; College campus waste; Combined-heat-and-power; Gasification; Waste characterization; Waste-to-energy;
D O I
10.5276/JSWTM.2016.87
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study focused on the potential for energy recovery of the low-food waste stream via gasification on a college campus. Waste was sampled using standard sampling protocols from several locations in both academic and residential buildings. Each sample was analyzed qualitatively (categorically) and quantitatively (proximate/ultimate analysis). Relative to average US domestic municipal solid waste (MSW), these waste samples contained higher levels of paper and plastic, comparable food waste, and lower levels of other components. Overall, the waste had lower moisture content and higher energy content than average domestic US MSW. Fuel lean combustion was simulated with excess air and suggested campus waste would produce higher reactor temperatures than average, domestic MSW. The potential for gasification to a producer gas was simulated using a chemical equilibrium approach. Cold gas efficiencies of 85% followed by electric power generation with typical efficiency would result in the potential offset of 2.5% of institutional electricity use, but a combined heat and power approach could also offset a substantial amount of the thermal energy requirements of the institution. A simplified three-component surrogate waste sample was proposed; analysis of two candidate mixtures showed overall good representation of actual campus waste and can facilitate future experimental efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 97
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Pytlar T.S., Status of Existing Biomass Gasification and Pyrolysis Facilities in North America, Proceedings of The18th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference, (2010)
[2]  
Chaivichitmalakul S., Simonton J.L., A Comparative Feasibility Study of Biomass Gasification between Developed and Developing Countries: An Economic Perspective on Waste and Residue, (2009)
[3]  
Davis J., Gelman R., Tomberlin G., Bain R., Hawaii and Guam Energy Improvement Technology Demonstration Project, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report, (2014)
[4]  
Wolters C., Kanaar M., Update of Nuon Power Buggenum Plant Performance and Fuel Flexibility, International Conference on Clean Coal Technologies for Our Future, (2005)
[5]  
Gaqa S., Mamphweli S., Katwire D., Meyer E., Synergistic Evaluation of the Biomass/Coal Blends for Co-Gasification Purposes, International Journal of Energy and Environment, 5, pp. 251-256, (2014)
[6]  
Paskach T.J., Reardon J.P., Gasification: Eliminating Risks Associated with Co-Firing Biomass, Proceedings of the ASME 2010 Power Conference, (2010)
[7]  
Turn S.Q., Bain R.L., Kinoshita C.M., Biomass Gasification for Combined Heat and Power in the Cane Sugar Industry, Int. Sugar Journal, 104, pp. 268-273, (2002)
[8]  
Mochida S., Abe T., Yasuda T., Gupta A.K., Heat Combined System Power with Advanced Gasification Technology for Biomass Wastes in Cleaner Combustion and Sustainable World, (2013)
[9]  
Beaty P., Gasifiers that Work, (2012)
[10]  
Ridjan I., Mathiesen B.V., Connolly D., A Review of Biomass Gasification Technologies in Denmark and Sweden, (2013)