Optimizing Co-generation performance of reactivity controlled compression ignition engines with solar steam reforming of methanol; a thermoeconomic, economic and exergoenvironmental analysis

被引:4
作者
Asgari, Armin [1 ]
Faal, Mehrdad Yousefi [1 ]
Yari, Mortaza [1 ]
Mohebbi, Milad [1 ]
Mahmoodi, Reza [2 ]
Noorzadeh, Saeed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tabriz, Dept Mech Engn, Tabriz 5166614766, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Fac Mech Engn, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Reactivity controlled compression ignition; engine; Methanol steam reforming; Computational fluid dynamics; Wasted heat recovery; Economic analysis; Multi-objective optimization; DUAL-FUEL COMBUSTION; WASTE HEAT; DIESEL-ENGINE; RCCI ENGINE; EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS; BIOGAS; EXERGY; SYSTEM; BIODIESEL; GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.10.419
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Reactivity-controlled compression ignition engines have garnered significant interest for their potential to deliver enhanced performance, particularly in environmental aspects. This study investigates the performance of such engines within a co-generation framework for simultaneous power and cooling production. Low reactivity fuel for the engine is derived from solar steam reforming of methanol, with waste heat recovered through a supercritical CO2 cycle and an absorption refrigeration cycle. The designed configuration undergoes comprehensive analysis encompassing thermodynamic, economic, and exergoenvironmental assessments, including parametric analysis. Optimal engine performance is evaluated through computational fluid dynamics, thermodynamic, and exergoenvironmental analyses across various syngas compositions and reforming conditions. Results indicate that a syngas portion of 60% at a reforming temperature and CH3OH to H2O ratio of 200 degrees C and 1.2 yields optimal engine performance. Besides, the inlet temperature of the CO2 turbine exhibits the greatest impact on co-generation performance. At the optimal state, co-generation's power and cooling load generation reach 467.8 kW and 225 kW, with a unit cost of 53.89 $/GJ, an exergy efficiency of 38.14%, a sustainability index of 1.622, and an exergoenvironmental impact index of 1.607.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 165
页数:21
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of a continuous solar-driven system with PCM for power, cooling and freshwater production [J].
Abbasi, Hamid Reza ;
Pourrahmani, Hossein .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 211
[2]   Performance assessment of a novel system using parabolic trough solar collectors for combined cooling, heating, and power production [J].
Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. ;
Hamdullahpur, Feridun ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 48 :161-172
[3]   Exergy modeling of a new solar driven trigeneration system [J].
Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Hamdullahpur, Feridun .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2011, 85 (09) :2228-2243
[4]  
Alhaddad MA, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY WARANGAL
[5]   Thermodynamic investigation of a hydrogen enriched natural gas fueled HCCI engine for the efficient production of power, heating, and cooling [J].
Almatrafi, Eydhah ;
Siddiqui, Mohd Asjad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 82 :111-122
[6]   Multi-objective grey wolf optimization and parametric study of a continuous solar-based tri-generation system using a phase change material storage unit [J].
Asgari, Armin ;
Yari, Mortaza ;
Mahmoudi, S. Mohammad S. ;
Desideri, Umberto .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2022, 55
[7]   Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses and multi- objective optimization of a novel cogeneration system for hydrogen and cooling production [J].
Asgari, Armin ;
Yari, M. ;
Mahmoudi, S. Mohammad S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (62) :26114-26134
[8]  
Beale JC, 1999, ATOMIZATION SPRAY, V9, P623, DOI 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v9.i6.40
[9]  
Bejan Adrian., 1995, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM
[10]   Experimental evaluation of a rice bran biodiesel - biogas run dual fuel diesel engine at varying compression ratios [J].
Bora, Bhaskor J. ;
Saha, Ujjwal K. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 87 :782-790