A multidimensional model for selecting personalised landmarks

被引:18
作者
Nuhn E. [1 ]
Timpf S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Geoinformatics Group, Institute of Geography, University of Augsburg, Augsburg
关键词
landmarks; pedestrian navigation; personalisation; Spatial cognition; wayfinding;
D O I
10.1080/17489725.2017.1401129
中图分类号
TN911 [通信理论];
学科分类号
081002 ;
摘要
Route instructions for pedestrians usually include many references to landmarks. The specific landmark used depends on the perceived familiarity of the traveller with the environment. While a human informant is able to perceive this personal dimension and react accordingly, existing landmark selection algorithms neglect the individual spatial knowledge of a wayfinder. In this paper, we share our ideas for incorporating a personal dimension into the definition of landmark salience. This complements current models, which identify landmark salience based on attributes of landmarks or integrate route-dependent landmarks based on environmental factors. We propose a conceptual framework for a multidimensional model for personalised landmarks that integrates three dimensions: a dimension describing the landmark, an environmental dimension and a personal dimension, which has been lacking in existing landmark salience models. We identify and discuss attributes and attribute values for each of the dimensions. Furthermore, salience measures for the attributes of the individual dimensions are developed. The novelty of this research consists of integrating all known attributes and potential values within a single model of salience, while focusing on the personal dimension. © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 180
页数:27
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Balaban C.Z., Roser F., Hamburger K., The Effect of Emotions and Emotionally Laden Landmarks on Wayfinding, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1880-1885, (2014)
[2]  
Burnett G., Smith D., May A., Supporting the Navigation Task: Characteristics of ‘Good’ Landmarks, Contemporary Ergonomics 2001, pp. 441-446, (2001)
[3]  
Caduff D., Timpf S., The Landmark Spider: Representing Landmark Knowledge for Wayfinding Tasks, AAAI Spring Symposium: Reasoning with Mental and External Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance, pp. 30-35, (2005)
[4]  
Caduff D., Timpf S., On the Assessment of Landmark Salience for Human Navigation, Cognitive Processing, 9, 4, pp. 249-267, (2008)
[5]  
Couclelis H., Golledge R.G., Gale N., Tobler W.R., Exploring the Anchor-point Hypothesis of Spatial Cognition, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7, 2, pp. 99-122, (1987)
[6]  
Daniel M.-P., Denis M., Spatial Descriptions as Navigational Aids: A Cognitive Analysis of Route Directions, Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, 1, pp. 45-52, (1998)
[7]  
Duckham M., Winter S., Robinson M., Including Landmarks in Routing Instructions, Journal of Location Based Services, 4, 1, pp. 28-52, (2010)
[8]  
Elias B., Determination of Landmarks and Reliability Criteria for Landmarks, 5th Workshop on Progress in Automated Map Generalization, IGN, (2003)
[9]  
Elias B., Extraktion von Landmarken für die Navigation, (2006)
[10]  
Elias B., Sester M., Incorporating Landmarks with Quality Measures in Routing Procedures, Geographic Information Science. GIScience 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4197, pp. 65-80, (2006)