A Meta-Analysis of Vulnerability and Trust in Human-Robot Interaction

被引:0
|
作者
Mckenna, Peter e. [1 ]
Ahmad, Muneeb I. [2 ]
Maisva, Tafadzwa [1 ]
Nesset, Birthe [1 ]
Lohan, Katrin [3 ]
Hastie, Helen [1 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] Swansea Univ, Swansea, Wales
[3] Univ Appl Sci Eastern Switzerland, Rapperswil Jona, Switzerland
关键词
Vulnerability; trust; risk; human-robot interaction; THREAT;
D O I
10.1145/3658897
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In human-robot interaction studies, trust is often defined as a process whereby a trustor makes themselves vulnerable to a trustee. The role of vulnerability however is often overlooked in this process but could play an important role in the gaining and maintenance of trust between users and robots. To better understand how vulnerability affects human-robot trust, we first reviewed the literature to create a conceptual model of vulnerability with four vulnerability categories. We then performed a meta-analysis, first to check the overall contribution of the variables included on trust. The results showed that overall, the variables investigated in our sample of studies have a positive impact on trust. We then conducted two multilevel moderator analysis to assess the effect of vulnerability on trust, including: (1) an intercept model that considers the relationship between our vulnerability categories and (2) a non-intercept model that treats each vulnerability category as an independent predictor. Only model 2 was significant, suggesting that to build trust effectively, research should focus on improving robot performance in situations where the users are unsure how reliable the robot will be. As our vulnerability variable is derived from studies of human-robot interaction and researcher reflections about the different risks involved, we relate our findings to these domains and make suggestions for future research avenues.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Trust Scale for Human-Robot Interaction: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of a Human Computer Trust Scale
    Pinto, Ana
    Sousa, Sonia
    Simoes, Ana
    Santos, Joana
    HUMAN BEHAVIOR AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 2022
  • [42] Interaction of Robot Speed and Distance in Human-Robot Collaboration: Impact on Human Trust, Safety, and Comfort
    Buttner, Sebastian Th.
    Alhaji, Basel
    Katariya, Kaushikbhai
    Prilla, Michael
    2024 33RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION, ROMAN 2024, 2024, : 264 - 271
  • [43] Human-Robot Interaction
    Jia, Yunyi
    Zhang, Biao
    Li, Miao
    King, Brady
    Meghdari, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS, 2018, 2018
  • [44] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquere, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    ADVANCED BIMANUAL MANIPULATION: RESULTS FROM THE DEXMART PROJECT, 2012, 80 : 123 - +
  • [45] Human-Robot Interaction
    Sethumadhavan, Arathi
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2012, 20 (03) : 27 - +
  • [46] Human-robot interaction
    Murphy R.R.
    Nomura T.
    Billard A.
    Burke J.L.
    IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 2010, 17 (02): : 85 - 89
  • [47] Human-robot interaction
    Kosuge, K
    Hirata, Y
    IEEE ROBIO 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND BIOMIMETICS, 2004, : 8 - 11
  • [48] Human-robot interaction
    Sidobre, Daniel
    Broquère, Xavier
    Mainprice, Jim
    Burattini, Ernesto
    Finzi, Alberto
    Rossi, Silvia
    Staffa, Mariacarla
    Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 2012, 80 (STAR): : 123 - 172
  • [49] Human-Robot Interaction
    Ivaldi, Serena
    Pateraki, Maria
    ERCIM NEWS, 2018, (114): : 6 - 7
  • [50] The Effects of Human-Robot Interactions and the Human-Robot Relationship on Robot Competence, Trust, and Acceptance
    Yuan, Yue
    Wu, Chih-Fu
    Niu, Jin
    Mao, Limin
    SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):