Research on the application of a wet electrostatic precipitator in coal-fired power plant for gypsum rain prevention and treatment

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Qizhen [1 ]
Shen, Zhigang [2 ]
Tao, Leixing [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Environmental Monitoring Center, Shanghai,200235, China
[2] Shanghai Oriental Enviro-Industry Co., Ltd., Shanghai,200233, China
[3] MingHua Electric Power Technology and Engineering Co., Ltd., Shanghai,200437, China
关键词
Drops - Pollution - Coal - Electrostatics - Rain - Coal fueled furnaces - Fossil fuel power plants - Particles (particulate matter) - Electrostatic precipitators - Gypsum - Mining;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Haze pollution involving PM2.5 is currently a serious problem in China, and the implementation of tougher measures to further reduce emissions from key air pollution sources such as coal-fired power plants has become an inevitable trend. Wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) technology is being adopted by an increasing number of power plants because of its ability to remove PM2.5 and other fine particulate matter. In this study, key indicators such as filterable particulate matter (FPM), condensable particulate matter (CPM), SO3, and droplets in the flue gas of Shanghai Changxing Island No.2 Power Plant were measured and analysed. The results indicate that the emission concentrations of total particulate matter (TPM) were 30.31 mg/m3 and 15.74 mg/m3, FPM were 20.31 mg/m3 and 6.09 mg/m3, PM2.5 were 4.06 mg/m3 and 2.50 mg/m3, SO3 were 4.51 mg/m3 and 3.06 mg/m3, and droplets were 114 mg/m3 and 102 mg/m3 at the stack when the WESP was off and on, respectively. Similarly, CPM accounted for 33% and 61% of TPM, respectively. This study demonstrates that the use of WESP technology has a significant effect on the removal of particulate matter and droplets.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 872
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Repowering a small coal-fired power plant
    Miell, Rick
    POWER ENGINEERING, 2007, 111 (11) : 24 - 24
  • [32] Optimization and application of oxygen control in supercritical coal-fired power plant
    Li, Jun
    Li, Weiwei
    Zhu, Fuyuan
    RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY II, PTS 1-4, 2012, 512-515 : 2236 - +
  • [33] 1600 megawatt coal-fired power plant
    不详
    BAUINGENIEUR, 2009, 84 : A14 - A14
  • [34] Court blocks coal-fired power plant
    不详
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2008, 86 (27) : 19 - 19
  • [35] Performance evaluation of a coal-fired power plant
    Sharma, A.Kr. (avdhesh_sharma35@yahoo.co.in), 1600, RAMS Consultants (09):
  • [36] Coal-fired power plant tour notes
    Yoshida, Yoshiaki
    Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, 2023, 143 (01):
  • [37] Mercury Capture within Coal-Fired Power Plant Electrostatic Precipitators: Model Evaluation
    Clack, Herek L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (05) : 1460 - 1466
  • [38] Analysis of the Causes of High Calcium Carbonate Content in Coal-Fired Power Plant Desulfurization Gypsum
    Zhang, Xueying
    Zhou, Xiaoxiang
    Dong, Xuefeng
    ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING III, PTS 1-4, 2013, 781-784 : 2582 - 2585
  • [39] Selenium Partitioning and Removal Across a Wet FGD Scrubber at a Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Senior, Constance L.
    Tyree, Corey A.
    Meeks, Noah D.
    Acharya, Chethan
    McCain, Joseph D.
    Cushing, Kenneth M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (24) : 14376 - 14382
  • [40] Mercury speciation and concentration at electrostatic precipitator in a 100MWth coal fired power plant.
    Xie, RC
    Duan, YF
    Cao, Y
    Li, LC
    Kellie, S
    Pan, WP
    Riley, JT
    Ho, K
    Chu, P
    Mehta, A
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 224 : U574 - U574