Diagenesis and pore evolution of tight sandstone reservoir: a case study from the Upper Triassic reservoir of the southwest Sichuan Basin, China

被引:0
|
作者
Shi Z. [1 ]
Li X. [1 ]
Dong D. [2 ]
Qiu Z. [2 ]
Lu B. [1 ]
Liang P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, CNPC, Langfang
[2] National Energy Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang
关键词
Diagenesis evolution; Pore evolution; Southwest Sichuan Basin; Tight sandstone reservoir; Upper Triassic;
D O I
10.13745/j.esf.yx.2017-6-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Diagenesis of tight sandstone reservoir dominates pore evolution, and further controls the distribution of relatively high-quality reservoirs. The Upper Triassic sandstone reservoir in the southwest Sichuan Basin, with overall porosity less than 6% and permeability less than 0.1×10-3 μm2, is a typical tight sandstone reservoir. In this study, a comprehensive analysis of cores, cast slices and fluid inclusion shows that the tight sandstone reservoir-dominated by intragranular dissolved pore, intergranular dissolved pore and moldic pore-experienced compaction, cementation, dissolution and metasomatism. Paragenetic relationship and fluid inclusion homogenization temperatures reveal the succession of the Upper Triassic sandstone: compaction→first phase (sequentially) fracture, illite cementation, quartz overgrowth and calcite cementation→second phase quartz overgrowth and siliceous infill→dissolution of feldspar and debris→chlorite cementation or illite cementation→second phase calcite cementation→dissolution of feldspar and debris→second phase fracture→third phase quartz overgrowth and siliceous infill followed by carbonate cementation→carbonate replacement of feldspar and quartz→third phase fracture→late stage calcite and quartz cementation. The measured vitrinite reflectivity (Ro) value and homogenization temperature of fluid inclusions indicate the sandstone is currently in the A2 to B diagenetic stage, when compaction, the main factor of reservoir densification, causes roughly 27.5% porosity loss; while siliceous and carbonate cementation are responsible for only 5.3% porosity loss. © 2018, Editorial Office of Earth Science Frontiers. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 190
页数:11
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Li Y., Allen P.A., Densmore A.L., Geological evolution of the Longmen Shan Foreland Basin(Western Sichuan, China)during the Late Triassic Indosinian Orogeny, Basin Research, 15, pp. 117-136, (2003)
  • [2] Surdam R.C., Crossey L.J., Integrated diagenetic modeling: a process-oriented approach for clastic systems, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 15, pp. 141-170, (1987)
  • [3] Surdam R.C., Crossey L.J., Hagen E.S., Organic-inorganic and sandstone diagenesis, AAPG Bulletin, 73, pp. 1-23, (1989)
  • [4] Beard D.C., Weyl P.K., Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand, AAPG Bulletin, 57, 2, pp. 349-369, (1973)
  • [5] Scherer M., Parameters influencing porosity in sandstone: a model for sandstone porosity prediction, AAPG Bulletin, 71, 5, pp. 485-491, (1987)
  • [6] Hegarty K.A., Subsidence history of Australia's southern margin: constraints on basin model, AAPG Bulletin, 72, 5, pp. 614-633, (1988)