“How Do You Measure a Relationship?” Assessment and Evaluation Challenges of Knowledge Exchange Activities in Information Work

被引:0
作者
O'Brien H. [1 ]
McDavid K. [1 ]
Yao J. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of British Columbia, Vancouver
关键词
community-engagement; information professionals; knowledge exchange; Library assessment and evaluation; relationship building;
D O I
10.1002/pra2.789
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Today there is increasing emphasis on knowledge exchange (KE), the movement of knowledge and expertise amongst diverse groups to enhance research uptake, use, and impact in healthcare, government, and community settings. Library and information science (LIS) professionals are central actors in KE though community engagement, scholarly communication, literacy, and cultural heritage initiatives, but (how) is this work formally documented and evaluated? Through interviews with 24 information professionals working in varied settings, we considered how KE activities fit into the current library assessment and evaluation landscape. Using thematic analysis, we identified challenges with placing this work within current assessment practices and evaluation frameworks and showing its value, as well as a desire for alternative, more dynamic assessment and evaluation methods. We discuss these findings with respect to previous research in LIS and KE more broadly to consider professional and organizational implications. Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science & Technology | Oct. 27 – 31, 2023 | London, United Kingdom. Author(s) retain copyright, but ASIS&T receives an exclusive publication license.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 302
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Research impact principles and framework, (2022)
[2]  
Bonaccorsi A., Chiarello F., Fantoni G., Impact for whom? Mapping the users of public research with lexicon-based text mining, Scientometrics, 126, pp. 1745-1774, (2021)
[3]  
Braun V., Clarke V., Hayfield N., Terry G., Thematic Analysis, Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, pp. 843-860, (2019)
[4]  
Braun V., Clarke V., Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11, 4, pp. 589-597, (2019)
[5]  
Burpee K.J., Fernandez L., Scholarly communication at Canadian research libraries: Conversations with librarians, Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2, 2, (2014)
[6]  
Carson L., Given L.M., The societal impact puzzle: a snapshot of a changing landscape across education and research, Policy Design and Practice, 4, 3, pp. 323-340, (2021)
[7]  
Long-Term Vision, Plans & Strategies. Corporate Strategic Plan, (2023)
[8]  
Clarke R.I., Stanton K.L., Grimm A., Zhang B., Invisible labor, invisible value: Unpacking Traditional assessment of academic library value, College & Research Libraries, 83, 6, (2022)
[9]  
Clarke V., Braun V., Thematic analysis, Encyclopedia of critical psychology, pp. 1947-1952, (2014)
[10]  
Connaway L.S., Harvey W., Kitzie V., Mikitish S., Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to research, (2017)