Comparison of precise orbit determination methods of zero-difference kinematic, dynamic and reduced-dynamic of GRACE-A satellite using SHORDE software

被引:11
作者
Li K. [1 ,2 ]
Zhou X. [1 ]
Guo N. [1 ,2 ]
Zhao G. [1 ]
Xu K. [1 ,2 ]
Lei W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 80, Nandan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 19, Yuquan Road Shijingshan District, Beijing
[3] Henan Polytechnic University, School of Geodesy and Land Information Engineering, Jiaozuo, Henan
关键词
Dynamic; GRACE satellite; Kinematic; Orbit determination accuracy; POD; Reduced-Dynamic;
D O I
10.1515/jag-2017-0004
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Zero-difference kinematic, dynamic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination (POD) are three methods to obtain the precise orbits of Low Earth Orbit satellites (LEOs) by using the on-board GPS observations. Comparing the differences between those methods have great significance to establish the mathematical model and is usefull for us to select a suitable method to determine the orbit of the satellite. Based on the zero-difference GPS carrier-phase measurements, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (SHAO) has improved the early version of SHORDE and then developed it as an integrated software system, which can perform the POD of LEOs by using the above three methods. In order to introduce the function of the software, we take the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) on-board GPS observations in January 2008 as example, then we compute the corresponding orbits of GRACE by using the SHORDE software. In order to evaluate the accuracy, we compare the orbits with the precise orbits provided by Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). The results show that: (1) If we use the dynamic POD method, and the force models are used to represent the non-conservative forces, the average accuracy of the GRACE orbit is 2.40cm, 3.91cm, 2.34cm and 5.17cm in radial (R), along-track (T), cross-track (N) and 3D directions respectively; If we use the accelerometer observation instead of non-conservative perturbation model, the average accuracy of the orbit is 1.82cm, 2.51cm, 3.48cm and 4.68cm in R, T, N and 3D directions respectively. The result shows that if we use accelerometer observation instead of the non-conservative perturbation model, the accuracy of orbit is better. (2) When we use the reduced-dynamic POD method to get the orbits, the average accuracy of the orbit is 0.80cm, 1.36cm, 2.38cm and 2.87cm in R, T, N and 3D directions respectively. This method is carried out by setting up the pseudo-stochastic pulses to absorb the errors of atmospheric drag and other perturbations. (3) If we use the kinematic POD method, the accuracy of the GRACE orbit is 2.92cm, 2.48cm, 2.76cm and 4.75cm in R, T, N and 3D directions respectively. In conclusion, it can be seen that the POD of GRACE satellite is practicable by using different strategies and methods. The orbit solution is well and stable, they all can obtain the GRACE orbits with centimeter-level precision. © 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston 2017.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Kang Z.G., Tapley B., Bettadpur S., Ries J., Nagel P., Pastor R., Precise orbit determination for the GRACE mission using only GPS data, Journal of Geodesy, 80, pp. 322-331, (2006)
[2]  
Jaggi A., Hugentobler U., Bock H., Beutler G., Precise orbit determination for GRACE using undifferenced or doubly differenced GPS data, Advances in Space Research, 39, pp. 1612-1619, (2007)
[3]  
Tapley B.D., Ries J.C., Davis G.W., Eanes R.J., Schutz B.E., Shum C.K., Watking M.M., Marshall J.A., Nerem R.S., Putney B.H., Klosko S.M., Luthcke S.B., Pavlis D., Williamson R.G., Zelensky N.P., Precision orbit determination for TOPEX/POSEIDON, Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, pp. 24383-24404, (1994)
[4]  
Swatschina P., Dynamic and Reduced-dynamic Precise Orbit Determination of Satellites in Low Earth Orbits, (2009)
[5]  
Guo J., Zhao Q.L., Li M., Hu Z.G., Centimeter level orbit determination for HY2A using GPS data (in Chinese), Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 38, pp. 52-55, (2013)
[6]  
Zhao Q.L., Liu J.N., Ge M.R., Shi C., Du R.L., Precise Orbit Determination of GPS and CHAMP Satellites with PANDA Software (in Chinese), Crustal Deformation & Earthquake, 25, pp. 113-116, (2005)
[7]  
Zhou X.H., Wang X.H., Zhao G., Peng H.L., Wu B., The precise orbit determination for HY2A satellite using GPS, DORIS and SLR Data (In Chinese), Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 40, pp. 1000-1005, (2015)
[8]  
Han B.M., GPS-based Kinematic Orbit Determination for Low Earth Satellites, (2003)
[9]  
Ma Y., Research on Key Technologies in Precise Orbit Determination for LEO Satellites Based on PPP Combinating of Space-borne Multi-GPS Data, (2014)
[10]  
Bock H., Efficient Methods for Determining Precise Orbits of Low Earth Orbiters Using the Global Positioning System, (2003)