Data-driven baseline generation for post-retrofit energy saving assessment, a comparison of statistical and machine learning methods

被引:3
作者
Kuivjogi, Helena [1 ]
Vasman, Sofia [1 ]
Petlenkov, Eduard [2 ]
Thalfeldt, Martin [1 ]
Kurnitski, Jarek [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Tallinn Univ Technol, Dept Comp Syst, Tallinn, Estonia
[3] Aalto Univ, Dept Civil Engn, POB 12100, Espoo 00076, Finland
关键词
Energy use baseline; Heating energy use; Electricity energy use; Commercial building; Degree-days; Data-driven; Metered data; Energy use prediction; Machine learning; Seasonal differentiations; CONSUMPTION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111016
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The renovation wave aims to improve energy performance of the existing building stock, encouraging development of methods for predicting post-retrofit energy use and quantifying savings. Therefore, establishing an energy use baseline is crucial for computing changes and savings. Data-driven techniques vary in effectiveness for this purpose. Selecting a suitable datadriven method for post-retrofit energy use modelling requires choosing between several approaches. This study compares two methods of establishing a baseline for post-retrofit evaluation, focusing on predicting heating and electricity energy use. One method utilizes monthly degreeday normalisation and baseline derivation, and the other employs machine learning techniques, including clustering to address seasonal variations and non-linear regression models like random forest and neural network. The comparison was based on CVRMSE, obtained by applying the methods to eight datasets. These individual datasets included metered and simulated data for heating and electricity energy use in two large non-residential buildings. An upper error margin of CVRMSE 25 % for annual energy use, as set in ASHRAE Guidelines, was not reached. The actual uncertainty during validation with simulated data ranged from 4.5 to 10.4 % for heating and electricity models using the degree-day method, and from 1.4 to 7.5 % for machine learning models. When applied to metered data, the degree-day method showed an uncertainty of 8.4-19.3 %, while machine learning models had an uncertainty of 6.11-17.5 %. Additionally, monthly percentage error analysis confirmed a considerably better performance of the machine learning models. This study contributes to the assessment of renovation impact and operational energy savings by offering additional perspectives on selecting energy use modelling methods, which are also applicable in the context of Minimum Energy Performance Standards.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Aggarwal C.C., 2015, DATA MINING TXB, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-14142-8, 10.1007/978-3-319-14142-8]
[2]   Occupancy-based energy consumption modelling using machine learning algorithms for institutional buildings [J].
Anand, Prashant ;
Deb, Chirag ;
Yan, Ke ;
Yang, Junjing ;
Cheong, David ;
Sekhar, Chandra .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2021, 252
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ASHRAE Handbook - Fundamentals (SI)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DEGREE DAYS THEORY A
[5]  
ASHRAE, 2023, ASHRAE guideline 14-2014 measurement of energy, demand, and water savings
[6]   Forecasting electrical consumption by integration of Neural Network, time series and ANOVA [J].
Azadeh, A. ;
Ghaderi, S. F. ;
Sohrabkhani, S. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2007, 186 (02) :1753-1761
[7]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[8]  
Chonan Y, 1996, ASHRAE TRAN, V102, P405
[9]  
Cuffe C., 2021, Revision of the energy performance of buildings directive Q4
[10]   Statistical analysis of neural networks as applied to building energy prediction [J].
Dodier, RH ;
Henze, GP .
JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2004, 126 (01) :592-600