Deregulation, flexibilization and privatization: historical and critical perspective of the brazilian electric sector

被引：4

作者：

Campos A.F. ^{[1
,4
]}

Silva N.F.D. ^{[2
,4
]}

Pereira M.G. ^{[3
,4
]}

Siman R.R. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Engineering and Sustainable Development Program (PPGES), Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Av. Fernando Ferrari, 514, Goiabeiras, Vitória, ZIP Code 29075-910, Espírito Santo

[2] Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Norte (IFRN), R. Raimundo Firmino de Oliveira, 400 - Conjunto Ulrick Graff, ZIP Code 59015-300, Rio Grande do Norte

[3] Energy Planning Program (PPE), Coordination of Postgraduate Programs in Engineering Address: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (COPPE/UFRJ), Cidade Universitária, Ilha do Fundão, Bloco C, Sala C-211, C.P. 68565, Rio de Janeiro

[4] International Virtual Institute of Global Change - IVIG, Centro de Tecnologia, Cidade Universitária, Building I - Room 129, P.O. Box 68501, Rio de Janeiro

来源：

Electricity Journal | 2020年 / 33卷 / 07期

关键词：

Brazil; Electricity sctor; Regional development; State reform;

D O I：

10.1016/j.tej.2020.106796

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This article presents the trajectory of the electricity sector in Brazil under a historical-critical perspective. It also seeks to understand the origin of the crisis of this type of State, its substitution by the regulatory-controlling State, and how neoliberal ideas have managed to gain space in the guiding thought of the Brazilian economy. Lastly, the transformations of the electricity sector motivated by the crisis of the market model — identified by the rationing of electricity in 2001/2002 — are observed, which gave rise to the Brazilian hybrid model, structured between 2003 and 2016, as well as the resumption of liberal thought in 2017/2018. As a methodological pathway, a theoretical study was developed from a historical-critical perspective. © 2020 Elsevier Inc.

引用

共 21 条

[1]

Alpizar-Casto I., Rodriguez-Monroy C., Review of Mexico´s Energy Reform in 2013: background, analysis of the reform and reactions, Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev., 58, pp. 725-736, (2016)

[2]

Atkinson A.B., Desigualdade: O Que Pode Ser Feito?, (2015)

[3]

Bauman Z., Vida Para O Consumo: a Transformação Das Pessoas Em Mercadoria, (2008)

[4]

Ben, Balanço Energético Nacional, 2002, (2002)

[5]

Ben, Balanço Energético Nacional, 2003, (2003)

[6]

Boito A., Saad-Filho A., State, state institutions, and political power in Brazil, Lat. Am. Perspect., 43, March (2), pp. 190-206, (2016)

[7]

Campos A.F., Integração Elétrica Brasil-peru: Oportunidades E Desafios, (2015)

[8]

Costa L.C., O governo FHC e a reforma do Estado Brasileiro, Pesquisa & Debate, SP, 11, 17, pp. 49-79, (2000)

[9]

Kundu G.K., Mishra B.B., Impact of reform and privatization on consumers: a case study of power sector reform in Orissa (India), Energy Policy, pp. 3537-3549, (2011)

[10]

Li H.Z., Savolainen M.K., Xiao X.Z., Lau S.Y., Have regulatory reforms improved the efficiency levels of the japanese electricity distribution sector? A cost metafrontier-based analysis, Energy Policy, 108, 2017, pp. 606-616, (2017)

← 1 2 3 →