共 45 条
Supporting knowledge justice through community science air quality monitoring and a reciprocal reporting process
被引:1
作者:
Serrano-Salomon, Valentina
[1
]
Westbrook, Marisa
[2
]
Perez, Noemy
[3
]
Pecenka, Jay
[4
]
Khalili, Aniya
[6
]
Sankhyan, Sumit
[6
]
Miller, Shelly
[6
]
Mishra, Shivakant
[5
]
Sullivan, Esther
[4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Sociol, UCB 327 Ketchum 195, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Portland State Univ, OHSU PSU Sch Publ Hlth, 1810 SW 5th Ave, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Univ Northern Colorado, Dept Sociol, Candelaria 2285, Greeley, CO 80639 USA
[4] Univ Colorado Denver, Dept Sociol, 1380 Lawrence St,Suite 420, Denver, CO 80217 USA
[5] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Comp Sci, 430 UCB,1111 Engn Dr, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[6] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Mech Engn, 427 UCB,111 Engn Dr, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金:
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词:
Community science;
Air monitoring;
Knowledge justice;
Logics of inquiry;
Environmental justice;
Air quality;
COPRODUCTION;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123414
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
In community science on air quality, low-cost air monitors have emerged as an opportunity to democratize data reporting and support knowledge justice by providing participants with instantaneous access to air quality data. In this study, we equipped residents in four environmental justice communities in North Denver with low-cost air monitors to collect real-time air quality data for four separate 30-day field deployments over two years. We conceptualize an improvement to conventional report-back processes by suggesting a 3-part approach - a reciprocal reporting process that includes 1) bidirectional open channels of communication with participants, 2) democratized data access via instant monitor data and written data summaries, and 3) responsive intervention opportunities to respond in real-time to participants air quality concerns. Through 120 interviews with 30 air quality monitor users after each of the four field deployments, we identify how this reciprocal reporting process increased Air Quality (AQ) awareness and supported distinct modes of environmental learning, which we term data-driven, health-conscious, and progressive logics of inquiry. In addition, this non-prescriptive approach centered participants' alternative ways of knowing, such as sensory experiences to understand pollution exposure, and fostered collective learning that ultimately furthered knowledge justice. Our study highlights the potential for a more robust and holistic approach to report-back processes within community science projects to foster flexibility, reciprocity, and responsiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文