A simulation optimization approach for weight valuation in analytic hierarchy process

被引:3
作者
Xiao, Hui [3 ,5 ]
Zeng, Sha [1 ]
Peng, Yi [2 ]
Kou, Gang [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[4] Xiangjiang Lab, Changsha 410205, Peoples R China
[5] Minist Educ, Big Data Lab Financial Secur & Behav, Lab Philosophy & Social Sci, SWUFE,Minist Educ, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Knowledge gradient (KG); Multiple criteria analysis; Ranking and selection (R&S); KNOWLEDGE-GRADIENT POLICY; COMPARISON MATRICES; BUDGET ALLOCATION; AHP; RANKING; SELECTION; DESIGNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.018
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a structured technique used to analyze complex decision-making situations such as resource allocation, benchmarking, and quality management. In the weight valuation step of using AHP to select the best design, pairwise comparison matrices are used to calculate the local priorities for designs that have contentious and unresolved criticisms. In this study, we propose a Bayesian approach using a Dirichletmultinomial model to estimate local priorities during weight valuation. Experts are only asked to select the best design with respect to predetermined criterion. Subsequently, local priorities are estimated without pairwise comparison matrices. To improve the efficiency of the AHP, we propose two expert allocation policies (AHP-KG and AHP-AKG) based on the ranking and selection procedures. Our numerical results show that the proposed AHP-KG and AHP-AKG policies outperform pure exploration and proportional allocation policies.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 864
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Reducing inconsistency measured by the geometric consistency index in the analytic hierarchy process [J].
Aguaron, Juan ;
Escobar, Maria Teresa ;
Moreno-Jimenez, Jose Maria .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 288 (02) :576-583
[2]   A Bayesian priorization procedure for AHP-group decision making [J].
Altuzarra, Alfredo ;
Moreno-Jimenez, Jose Maria ;
Salvador, Manuel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (01) :367-382
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BAYESIAN DATA ANAL, DOI DOI 10.1201/B16018
[5]   A TRADEOFF ANALYSIS FOR ROUGH TERRAIN CARGO HANDLERS USING THE AHP - AN EXAMPLE OF GROUP DECISION-MAKING [J].
BARD, JF ;
SOUSK, SF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1990, 37 (03) :222-228
[6]   Dynamic programming and suboptimal control: A survey from ADP to MPC [J].
Bertsekas, DP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2005, 11 (4-5) :310-334
[7]   Posterior-Based Stopping Rules for Bayesian Ranking-and-Selection Procedures [J].
Eckman, David J. ;
Henderson, Shane G. .
INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2022, 34 (03) :1711-1728
[8]   Distributionally Robust Selection of the Best [J].
Fan, Weiwei ;
Hong, L. Jeff ;
Zhang, Xiaowei .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 66 (01) :190-208
[9]   A KNOWLEDGE-GRADIENT POLICY FOR SEQUENTIAL INFORMATION COLLECTION [J].
Frazier, Peter I. ;
Powell, Warren B. ;
Dayanik, Savas .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 47 (05) :2410-2439
[10]   Robust ranking and selection with optimal computing budget allocation [J].
Gao, Siyang ;
Xiao, Hui ;
Zhou, Enlu ;
Chen, Weiwei .
AUTOMATICA, 2017, 81 :30-36