Using iREAD in understanding online reading strategies applied by science and technology students

被引:3
作者
Azmuddin R.A. [1 ]
Nor Fariza M.N. [2 ]
Hamat A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pekan
[2] Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi
关键词
Education; English for specific purposes; Hypertext materials; Malaysian ESL tertiary level learners; Navigational strategies; Online reading strategies; Science and technology;
D O I
10.4018/IJWLTT.2018070102
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This article describes how with the growth of online learning, reading hypertext materials requires both online reading and navigational strategies. This article was conducted as part of a pilot study on qualitative data collection into reading of Science and Technology hypertexts that focuses on reading and navigational strategies of five university students enrolled in undergraduate Engineering programs. It presents the application of iREAD; Interactive Reading for Academic Disciplines that integrates various e-literacy tools to facilitate reading of academic hypertexts. Student’s participation was within iREAD through the use of annotation tool and discussion forum. The two-phased data collection was conducted qualitatively through semi-structured interviews, screen records, and retrospective interviews. The results show that the participants mainly used a global reading strategy, serial, and mixed overview navigational strategies in the online reading environment. In addition, the article concluded that iREAD assists students to understand and organize hypertexts materials better with the use of e-tools. Copyright © 2018, IGI Global.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 32
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]  
McClune B., Jarman R., From aspiration to action: A learning intentions model to promote critical engagement with science in the print-based media, Research in Science Education, 41, 5, pp. 691-710, (2011)
[22]  
Nor Fariza M.N., Afendi H., Mohamed Amin E., Patterns of discourse in online interaction: Seeking evidence of the collaborative learning process, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25, 3, pp. 237-256, (2012)
[23]  
Nor Fariza M.N., Hazita A., Afendi H., Investigating students’ use of online annotation tool in an online reading environment, Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19, 3, pp. 87-101, (2013)
[24]  
Oliveras B., Marquez C., Sanmarti N., Students’ attitudes to information in the press: Critical reading of a newspaper article with scientific content, Research in Science Education, 44, 4, pp. 603-626, (2014)
[25]  
Ostovar-Namaghi S.A., Noghabi A.E., A Comparison of perceived use of the metacognitive reading strategies by Iranian master of science students for hypertext and printed academic materials, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5, 4, pp. 865-872, (2014)
[26]  
Pookcharoen S., Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies Among Thai EFL University Students, (2009)
[27]  
Protopsaltis A., Reading strategies in hypertexts and factors influencing hyperlink selection, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2, pp. 191-213, (2008)
[28]  
Ruhil Amal A., Nor Fariza M.N., Afendi H., Metacognitive online reading and navigational strategies by science and technology university students, GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 17, 3, pp. 18-36, (2017)
[29]  
Sheorey R., Mokhtari K., Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers, System, 29, 4, pp. 431-449, (2001)
[30]  
Su A.Y.S., Yang S.J.H., Hwang W.-Y., Zhang J., A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments, Computers & Education, 55, 2, pp. 752-766, (2010)