The novelty 'sweet spot' of invention

被引：30

作者：

He Y. ^{[1
]}

Luo J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Singapore University of Technology and Design, Engineering Product Development Pillar, Singapore

来源：

Design Science | 2017年 / 3卷

关键词：

Invention; Novelty; Technology combination;

D O I：

10.1017/dsj.2017.23

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Invention arises from novel combinations of prior technologies. However, prior studies of creativity have suggested that overly novel combinations may be harmful to invention. Apart from the factors of expertise, market, etc., there may be such a thing as 'too much' or 'too little' novelty that will determine an invention's future value, but little empirical evidence exists in the literature. Using technical patents as the proxy of inventions, our analysis of 3.9 million patents identifies a clear 'sweet spot' in which the mix of novel combinations of prior technologies favors an invention's eventual success. Specifically, we found that the invention categories with the highest mean values and hit rates have moderate novelty in the center of their combination space and high novelty in the extreme of their combination space. Too much or too little central novelty suppresses the positive contribution of extreme novelty in the invention. Furthermore, the combination of scientific and broader knowledge beyond patentable technologies creates additional value for invention and enlarges the advantage of the novelty sweet spot. These findings may further enable data-driven methods both for assessing invention novelty and for profiling inventors, and may inspire a new strand of data-driven design research and practice. Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license.

引用

共 48 条

[1]

Alstott J., Triulzi G., Yan B., Luo J., Inventors' movements and performance across technology domains, Design Science, (2017)

[2]

Alstott J., Triulzi G., Yan B., Luo J., Mapping technology space by normalizing technology relatedness networks, Scientometrics, 110, pp. 443-479, (2017)

[3]

Amabile T.M., Creativity in Context: Update to 'The Social Psychology of Creativity', (1996)

[4]

Arthur W.B., The structure of invention, Research Policy, 36, pp. 274-287, (2007)

[5]

Basnet S., Magee C.L., Modeling of technological performance trends using design theory, Design Science, 2, (2016)

[6]

Boden M.A., Dimensions of Creativity, (1996)

[7]

Boschma R., Heimeriks G., Balland P.-A., Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities, Research Policy, 43, pp. 107-114, (2014)

[8]

Breschi S., Lissoni F., Malerba F., Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification, Research Policy, 32, pp. 69-87, (2003)

[9]

Brown D.C., Computational design creativity evaluation, Design Computing and Cognition'14, (2015)

[10]

Chan J., Dow S.P., Schunn C.D., Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration?, Design Studies, 36, pp. 31-58, (2015)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →