Experimental investigation on seismic performance of energy dissipation subsidiary piers for long-span cable-stayed bridges

被引:0
作者
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University
来源
Sun, L. (lmsun@tongji.edu.cn) | 1600年 / Science Press卷 / 41期
关键词
Buckling restrained brace; Cable-stayed bridge; Damage control; Experimental investigation; Seismic performance; Shear link; Subsidiary pier;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2013.09.009
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The concept of structural damage control is that easily replaceable sacrificial elements deform plastically to dissipate seismic energy while primary components remain elastic or are subjected to minor damage. According to that the seismic performance of long-span cable-stayed bridges depends mainly on their structural systems, a new damage control strategy, namely reducing the damage of the towers by means of sacrificing the subsidiary piers, was proposed. Three large-scale reinforced concrete models with rectangular hollow sections were tested under cyclic quasi-static loads to investigate seismic performance of the subsidiary piers. The first specimen was a single-column pier designed originally, while the others were twin-column piers. Shear links (SLs) and buckling restrained braces (BRBs) were installed between the two columns as a series of energy dissipation elements. Failure patterns, hysteretic curves, displacement ductility and energy dissipation capacity, skeleton curves and stiffness degradation of the specimens which were under cyclic loading, and deformation capacity of the energy dissipation elements, were investigated. The results show that compared with the single-column pier, the energy dissipation elements increase the stiffness and strength of the twin-column piers and improve their seismic performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1333 / 1340
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Roeder C.W., Popov E.P., Eccentrically braced steel frames for earthquakes, Journal of the Structural Division-ASCE, 104, 3, (1978)
[2]  
Wada A., Connor J., Kawai H., Et al., Damage tolerant structures, Proceedings of Fifth US-Japan Workshop on the Improvement of Building Structural Design and Construction Practices, pp. 27-39, (1992)
[3]  
Connor J.J., Wada A., Iwata M., Et al., Damage-controlled structures. I: Preliminary design methodology for seismically active regions, Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 123, 4, (1997)
[4]  
Mcdaniel C.C., Seible F., Influence of inelastic tower links on cable-supported bridge response, Journal of Bridge Engineering-ASCE, 10, 3, (2005)
[5]  
Cho K., Kim S., Choi M., Et al., A study on seismic performance of girder bridges equipped with bi-directional energy-dissipating sacrificial devices, International Journal of Steel Structures, 8, 1, (2008)
[6]  
Vargas R., Bruneau M., Analytical response and design of buildings with metallic structural fuses I, Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 135, 4, (2009)
[7]  
Vargas R., Bruneau M., Experimental response of buildings designed with metallic structural fuses II, Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 135, 4, (2009)
[8]  
El-Bahey S., Bruneau M., Bridge piers with structural fuses and bi-steel columns. I: Experimental testing, Journal of Bridge Engineering-ASCE, 17, 1, (2012)
[9]  
Ding W., Lu Z., Liu Z., Seismic design principle and experimental study of passively split pier, Bridge Construction, 9, 5, (2006)
[10]  
Sun L., Xie W., Damage mechanism and damage control of long span cable-stayed bridges under strong earthquake, Fifth World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring, pp. 108-120, (2010)