The effects of policy uncertainty and risk aversion on carbon capture, utilization, and storage investments

被引:2
作者
Colombe, Connor [1 ]
Leibowicz, Benjamin D. [1 ]
Mendoza, Benjamin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Operat Res & Ind Engn, ETC 5 128D, 204 E Dean Keeton St, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Carbon capture; Energy infrastructure; Optimization; Uncertainty; Risk aversion; Subsidies; CLIMATE POLICY; NATURAL-GAS; CO2; CAPTURE; INFRASTRUCTURE; PREFERENCE; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114212
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many model-based decarbonization pathways include substantial carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), and engineering cost estimates suggest that these technologies should be profitable to deploy under current incentives, such as the 45Q tax credits in the United States. However, CCUS investments have been slow to materialize. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which policy uncertainty and investor risk aversion may explain the limited buildout of CCUS infrastructure to date. To do so, we develop a two-stage stochastic programming model for optimal CCUS infrastructure network design that incorporates policy uncertainty and risk aversion as novel features. We then apply it to an empirically parameterized case study of the Texas- Louisiana Gulf Coast region. Our results show that the current 45Q incentive levels make a fair number of CCUS projects profitable even if they were to be discontinued after ten years. Moreover, while future policy uncertainty and risk aversion reduce CCUS development, the maximum effect size is only a 16% decline in expected total CO2 captured. We find policy uncertainty plays a more important role than investor risk aversion in the development of CCUS infrastructure, with increased uncertainty leading to reduced CO2 capture and investment.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] An Integrated Assessment Model for comparing electricity decarbonisation scenarios: The case for Spain
    Bastarrica, Luis Antonio Galiano
    Esquinas, Eva M. Buitrago
    Pou, Maria Angeles Caraballo
    Ovando, Rocio Yniguez
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 178
  • [2] Electric sector capacity planning under uncertainty: Climate policy and natural gas in the US
    Bistline, John E.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 51 : 236 - 251
  • [3] Natural gas, uncertainty, and climate policy in the US electric power sector
    Bistline, John E.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 74 : 433 - 442
  • [4] Injection rates and cost estimates for CO2 storage in the west Mediterranean region
    Carneiro, Julio
    Martinez, Roberto
    Suarez, Isabel
    Zarhloule, Yassine
    Rimi, Abdelkrim
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (06) : 2951 - 2962
  • [5] Electric Power Research Institute, 2022, LCRI Net-Zero 2050: U.S. Economy-Wide Deep Decarbonization Scenario Analysis
  • [6] EPA, 2022, EPA facility level GHG emissions data
  • [7] Modelling plant-level abatement costs and effects of incentive policies for coal-fired power generation retrofitted with CCUS
    Fan, Jing-Li
    Li, Zezheng
    Li, Kai
    Zhang, Xian
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 165
  • [8] Investment under market and climate policy uncertainty
    Fuss, Sabine
    Szolgayova, Jana
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Gusti, Mykola
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2008, 85 (08) : 708 - 721
  • [9] Global CCS Institute, 2022, Technical Report
  • [10] International Energy Agency, 2011, Technical Report