Drivers' road accident risk perception. A comparison between face-to-face interview and web-based survey

被引:0
作者
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, Rende, CS
来源
| 1600年 / Aracne Editrice卷
关键词
Driver's perception; Face-to-face and web-based survey; Road accident risk; Stated Preference (SP) experiment;
D O I
10.4399/97888548728995
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper we investigate on the perceptions of the drivers on the risk of road accident. An objective of the research is to understand how driving attitudes and behaviour influence road accident risk according to the opinions of the drivers. We analyse two different kinds of perceptions: perceptions of users interviewed through a face-to-face survey, and perceptions of users reached by web. So, another important objective of the research is to verify the differences between the two samples, and the reliability of the responses. We proposed to the users an experiment based on the Stated Preferences according to which respondents had to express a ranking of hypothetical driving scenarios characterized by different levels of attributes describing driving attitudes. Logit models are used to estimate the influence of each attribute on accident risk. The results obtained from the two samples conduct to very different interpretations, but we can definitively say that the respect/violation of the driving rules and the correct/incorrect driver behaviour certainly affect the level of accident riskiness perceptions. From the results, we could retain online survey as reliable, and a valid alternative to traditional methods such as face-to-face survey, especially if we consider the advantages linked to the lower cost and the reduced risks of social desirability bias associated with self-administration.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 72
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Af Wahlberg A.E., Social desirability effects in driver behaviour inventories, Journal of Safety Research, 41, pp. 99-106, (2010)
  • [2] Al-Subaihi A.A., Comparison of Web and Telephone Survey Response Rates in Saudi Arabia, The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 2, pp. 123-132, (2008)
  • [3] Bayart C., Bonnel P., Comparison of Web and Face-to-Face Household Travel SurveyApplication to Lyon Case, Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Leeuwenhorst Conference Centre, (2008)
  • [4] Ben-Akiva M.E., Lerman S.R., Dicrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, (1985)
  • [5] Bhat C.R., Random Utility-Based Discrete Choice Models for Travel Demand analysis, Transportation systems planning, pp. 1-29, (2003)
  • [6] Bonnel P., Le Nir M., The Quality of Survey Data: Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviews, Transportation, 25, pp. 147-167, (1998)
  • [7] Braunsberger K., Wybenga H., Gates R., A Comparison of Reliability Between Telephone and Web-based Surveys, Journal of Business Research, 60, pp. 758-764, (2007)
  • [8] Clarke D.D., Ward P., Bartle C., Truman W., Young driver accidents in the UK: The influence of age, experience, and time of day, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, pp. 871-878, (2006)
  • [9] Cobanoglu C., Warde B., Moreo P.J., A Comparison of Mail, Fax, and Web-based Survey Methods, International Journal of Market Research, 43, 4, pp. 441-452, (2001)
  • [10] Coderre F., Mathieu A., St-Laurent N., Comparison of the Quality of Qualitative Data Obtained Through Telephone, Postal and Email Surveys. Int, Journal of Market Research, 46, 3, pp. 347-357, (2004)