The influence of soft factors on quality improvement and performance: Perceptions from managers

被引:46
作者
Abdullah, Muhammad Madi Bin [1 ]
Uli, Jegak [2 ]
Tarí, Juan José [3 ]
机构
[1] Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Penang Darul Makmur
[2] Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan
[3] University of Alicante, Alicante
关键词
Electronic industry; Malaysia; Managers; Organizational performance; Quality improvement;
D O I
10.1108/17542730810898412
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to investigate the influence of soft factors on quality improvement and performance and also to examine the link between quality improvement and organizational performance. Design/methodology/ approach - The paper uses data from perceptions from managers in 255 electrical and electronics (E&E) firms in Malaysia and it develops regression and correlation analysis to test the relationships between soft factors, quality improvement and organizational performance. Findings - The following soft factors were found to have significant influence on quality improvement: management commitment; customer focus; employee involvement; training and education; and reward and recognition. Organizational performance was significantly influenced by the following soft factors: management commitment; customer focus; and employee involvement. Finally, this paper empirically shows that firm performance will increase when the organizations implement more quality improvement practices. Practical implications - The results of this paper can be used by managers to prioritize the implementation of the soft factors. For instance, those factors that are found to have a positive impact on quality improvement practice and performance can be recommended to managers so that they can allocate resources to improve these factors to achieve higher organizational performance. Originality/value - This paper identifies the soft factors that can influence the quality improvement practice and organizational performance in E&E Malaysian firms. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 452
页数:16
相关论文
共 65 条
[31]  
Hendricks K.B., Singhal V.R., Does implementing an effective TQM program actually improve operating performance? Empirical evidence from firms that have won quality awards, Management Science, 43, 9, pp. 1258-74, (1997)
[32]  
Hendricks K.B., Singhal V.R., Firm characteristics, total quality management, and financial performance, Journal of Operations Management, 19, pp. 269-85, (2001)
[33]  
Ho D.C.K., Duffy V.G., Shih H.M., Total quality management: An empirical test for mediation effect, International Journal of Production Research, 39, 3, pp. 529-48, (2001)
[34]  
Idris M.A., McEwan W., Belavendram N., The adoption of ISO and total quality management in Malaysia, The TQM Magazine, 8, 5, pp. 65-8, (1996)
[35]  
Ismail M.Y., Baradie M.E.I., Hashmi M.S.J., Quality management in the manufacturing industry: Practice vs performance, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 35, 34, pp. 519-22, (1998)
[36]  
Jacobson R., Aaker D., The strategic role of product quality, Journal of Marketing, 51, 4, pp. 31-44, (1987)
[37]  
Juran J., Juran on Quality Improvement, (1982)
[38]  
Kanji G.K., Tambi A.M.B., Total quality management in UK higher education institutions, Total Quality Management, 10, 1, pp. 129-53, (1999)
[39]  
Kaynak H., The relationship between TQM practices and their effects on firm performance, Journal of Operations Management, 21, 4, pp. 405-35, (2003)
[40]  
Lu E., Sohal A., Success factors, weaknesses and myths concerning TQM implementation in Australia, Total Quality Management, 4, 3, pp. 245-55, (1993)