Application of Load Mapping Method on Specification Determination in Spacecraft Vibration Test

被引：0
|
作者：
Yang Z. [1 ,2 ]
Ding Y. [2 ]
Wang Y. [1 ,2 ]
Lu D. [2 ]
Ren W. [2 ]
Zhang X. [3 ]
机构：
[1] University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing
[2] Key Laboratory of Space Utilization, Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing
[3] State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an
来源：
Zhendong Ceshi Yu Zhenduan/Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis | 2017年 / 37卷 / 05期
关键词：
Load mapping; Response equivalence; Spacecraft; Vibration environment test;
D O I：
10.16450/j.cnki.issn.1004-6801.2017.05.013
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The determination of vibration tests specifications is a prerequisite for rightly examination of the capability of spacecraft structure. The rigid boundary condition in the experiments is sometimes significantly different from that of the real mounting structure, resulting in the discrepancy of transfer function. Taking the envelope of interface acceleration as the specification would cause over-testing or under-testing condition. Load mapping method (LMM), which aims at the response equivalence, takes the real response and experiment boundary condition as the input and uses optimization algorithm to calculate the mapping load based on FEM model. It is found that LMM can solve the under-testing caused by boundary condition difference from the analysis and test results of a representative structure that has a flexible boundary condition. The over-testing at resonance frequencies of the payload can be reduced by notching method or Force Limit Method. © 2017, Editorial Department of JVMD. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：934 / 940
页数：6
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Ma X., Han Z., Zou Y., Et al., Review and assessment of spacecraft mechanical environment analysis and specification determination, Journal of Astronautics, 33, 1, pp. 1-12, (2012)
  • [2] Huang B., Zhang Z., Li H., Et al., Applicationof force limited control in vibration test, Structure & Environment Engineering, 39, 5, pp. 18-27, (2012)
  • [3] Bellini M., Luison D., Tizzani L., Cygnus pressurized cargo module: validation of mathematical model and dynamic qualification of secondary structure, European Conference on Spacecraft Structure Material & Environmental Testing, pp. 513-518, (2012)
  • [4] Zhou Y., Song H., Analysis of a vibration overtest problem and a force-limited control vibration test, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 27, 4, pp. 82-84, (2008)
  • [5] Scharton T.D., Force Limited Vibration Testing Monograph, pp. 20-22, (1997)
  • [6] NASA Technical Handbook 7004C, pp. 24-26, (2012)
  • [7] Ding Y., Yang Z., Ren W., Et al., Using response projection method to eliminate the effect of boundary difference during vibration tests in spacecraft, The 22nd International Congress on Sound and Vibration, pp. 1402-1411, (2015)
  • [8] Chen Z., Wen X., Zhou J., Et al., Applicationof force limited control in vibration test, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 32, 6, pp. 105-108, (2013)
  • [9] Bettacchioli A., Simulation of satellite vibration test, European Conference on Spacecraft Structure Material & Environmental Testing, pp. 332-340, (2014)
  • [10] Akagi H., Ando S., Shi Q., Et al., Prediction of the vibroacoustic response of the equipment mounted on the infrared space telescope “SPICA”, European Conference on Spacecraft Structure Material & Environmental Testing, pp. 422-428, (2014)
12