Risk-Balanced Routing Strategy for Service Function Chains of Cyber-Physical Power System Considering Cross-Space Cascading Failure

被引：0

作者：

Wang, He ^{[1
]}

Tong, Xingyu ^{[1
]}

Yu, Huanan ^{[1
]}

Hu, Xiao ^{[1
]}

Bian, Jing ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] The Key Laboratory of Modern Power System Simulation and Control Renewable Energy Technology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin

来源：

Energy Engineering: Journal of the Association of Energy Engineering | 2024年 / 121卷 / 09期

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

cascading failure; Cyber-physical power system; risk balance; routing optimization; service function chain;

D O I：

10.32604/ee.2024.050594

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Cyber-physical power system (CPPS) has significantly improved the operational efficiency of power systems. However, cross-space cascading failures may occur due to the coupling characteristics, which poses a great threat to the safety and reliability of CPPS, and there is an acute need to reduce the probability of these failures. Towards this end, this paper first proposes a cascading failure index to identify and quantify the importance of different information in the same class of communication services. On this basis, a joint improved risk-balanced service function chain routing strategy (SFC-RS) is proposed, which is modeled as a robust optimization problem and solved by column-and-constraint generation (C-CG) algorithm. Compared with the traditional shortest-path routing algorithm, the superiority of SFC-RS is verified in the IEEE 30-bus system. The results demonstrate that SFC-RS effectively mitigates the risk associated with information transmission in the network, enhances information transmission accessibility, and effectively limits communication disruption from becoming the cause of cross-space cascading failures. © 2024 The Authors.

引用

页码：2525 / 2542

页数：17

共 28 条

[1]

Li Y., Et al., An effective node-to-edge interdependent network and vulnerability analysis for digital coupled power grids, Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst, 2022, pp. 1-13, (2022)

[2]

Yohanandhan R. V., Elavarasan R. M., Manoharan P., Mihet-Popa L., Cyber-physical power system (CPPS): A review on modeling, simulation, and analysis with cyber security applications, IEEE Access, 8, pp. 151019-151064, (2020)

[3]

Gao X., Peng M., Tse C. K., Zhang H., A stochastic model of cascading failure dynamics in cyber-physical power systems, IEEE Syst. J, 14, 3, pp. 4626-4637, (2020)

[4]

Ti B., Li G., Zhou M., Wang J., Resilience assessment and improvement for cyber-physical power systems under typhoon disasters, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 13, 1, pp. 783-794, (2022)

[5]

Behfarnia A., Eslami A., Error correction coding meets cyber-physical systems: Message-passing analysis of self-healing interdependent networks, IEEE Trans. Commun, 65, 7, pp. 2753-2768, (2017)

[6]

Cai Y., Cao Y., Li Y., Huang T., Zhou B., Cascading failure analysis considering interaction between power grids and communication networks, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 7, 1, pp. 530-538, (2016)

[7]

Final report on the August 14, 2003 blackout in the united states and canada, (2004)

[8]

Wang J., Su Y., Zhou J., Practice and experience in dispatching of southern power grid during rare ice disaster at beginning of year 2008, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Elect. Utility Deregulation Restructuring Power Technol. (DRPT), pp. 1869-1874, (2011)

[9]

Liang G., Weller S. R., Zhao J., Luo F., Dong Z. Y., The 2015 Ukraine blackout: Implications for false data injection attacks, IEEE Trans. Power Syst, 32, 4, pp. 3317-3318, (2017)

[10]

Djunisic S., Fire, high renewables share caused Mexico’s Dec. 28 blackout, experts say

← 1 2 3 →