Multi-actor perspective, socio-technical barriers, and microgrid development in China

被引:5
作者
Liu, Minsi [1 ]
Lo, Kevin [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Nanfang Coll, Sch Publ Adm, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Geog, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Microgrid; Socio-technical barriers; Multi-level perspective; Multi-actor perspective; China; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; REGIME DESTABILIZATION; GERMAN; LESSONS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tej.2022.107158
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The microgrid is a new concept in China and may potentially play an important role in enhancing the resilience and sustainability of electricity generation and distribution. However, the development of microgrids faces many challenges. This study examines the barriers to microgrid development using a case study of a pilot zone in Qingdao. Drawing on the theories of multi-level perspective and multi-actor perspective, we presented new empirical evidence on how the pilot microgrid projects were rendered difficult by the resistance from the existing industrial regime and the challenging economic and socio-political environments. The monopoly of state-owned grid operators in electricity transmission and distribution is difficult to break at a local level. The findings deepen our understanding of the challenges encountered by innovators in China's microgrid development and hold implications for policymakers in making more targeted policy mixes to support energy transition activities.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Socio-technical barriers affecting large-scale deployment of AI-enabled wearable medical devices among the ageing population in China [J].
Xing, Fei ;
Peng, Guochao ;
Zhang, Bingqian ;
Li, Shuyang ;
Liang, Xinting .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 166
[42]   Improving Residential Satisfaction of University Dormitories through Post-Occupancy Evaluation in China: A Socio-Technical System Approach [J].
Ning, Yan ;
Chen, Jiaojiao .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (10)
[43]   Energizing dissensus: Socio-technical (counter) imaginaries along the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor [J].
Mehmood, Asif ;
Cousins, Joshua J. .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY & SPACE, 2024, 42 (02) :294-316
[44]   Linking socio-technical transition studies and organisational change management: Steps towards an integrative, multi-scale heuristic [J].
Boegel, Paula ;
Pereverza, Kateryna ;
Upham, Paul ;
Kordas, Olga .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 232 :359-368
[45]   Socio-technical design principles for a multi-stakeholder agriculture extension information system in Ethiopia [J].
Atinaf, Muluneh ;
Anteneh, Salehu ;
Kifle, Mesfin .
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 30 (03) :493-521
[46]   Understanding the barriers and exploring the possibilities of the organic livestock sector in dehesa agroforestry systems: a multi-actor approach for effective diagnosis [J].
Horrillo, Andres ;
Gaspar, Paula ;
Mesias, Francisco J. ;
Elghannam, Ahmed ;
Escribano, Miguel .
RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2020, 35 (06) :663-677
[47]   Socio-technical dynamics of carbon dioxide capture and storage: A systems view on enablers and barriers at North Sea Port [J].
Swennenhuis, Floris ;
de Gooyert, Vincent ;
de Coninck, Heleen C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2024, 137
[48]   How will renewables expansion and hydrocarbon decline impact security? Analysis from a socio-technical transitions perspective [J].
Kivimaa, Paula ;
Sivonen, Marja Helena .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2023, 48
[49]   Barriers and risks of socio-technical transition towards sustainable road transport in sparsely populated areas: case of Finnish Lapland [J].
Kirjavainen, Janne ;
Suopajaervi, Leena .
EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2025, 17 (01)
[50]   Socio-technical analysis of the electricity sector of Mexico: Its historical evolution and implications for a transition towards low-carbon development [J].
Jano-Ito, Marco A. ;
Crawford-Brown, Douglas .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 55 :567-590