Sustainability performance measurement framework for supply chain management

被引：0
作者：
Santiteerakul, Salinee [1 ,2 ]
Sekhari, Aicha [2 ]
Bouras, Abdelaziz [2 ,3 ]
Sopadang, Apichat [1 ]
机构：
[1] Excellence Center in Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai
[2] DISP Laboratory, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Bron
[3] Qatar University - IctQATAR Depart., Qatar University, Doha
来源：
International Journal of Product Development | 2015年 / 20卷 / 03期
关键词：
Conceptual framework; Performance measurement; Product development; Supply chain management; Sustainability performance; Sustainable supply chain;
D O I：
10.1504/IJPD.2015.069325
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Sustainability of supply chains has been recognised as a competitive indicator for business. The most widely used framework for implementing sustainability practices is the triple bottom line (TBL). However, the TBL is a holistic view for measuring sustainability performance. A good categorisation in each TBL dimension is one of the challenges in the sustainable supply chain management (sSCM) research field. Another challenge is dealing with a wide range of objectives, criteria and elements in the supply chain. A clear border of supply chain scope helps supply chains obtains a precise strategic direction and performance measurement system. This work fills these gaps by developing a conceptual framework, which transforms the TBL concept into three management levels of implementation by analysing the context of sustainable development and the engagement level of the supply chain. This framework can be applied to establish and construct sustainability metrics in supply chain management. Copyright © 2015 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码：221 / 238
页数：17
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Beamon M., Chen V.C.P., Performance analysis of conjoined supply chains, International Journal of Production Research, 39, 14, pp. 3195-3218, (2001)
  • [2] Carter C.R., Rogers D.S., A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38, 5, pp. 360-387, (2008)
  • [3] Dyllick T., Hockerts K., Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability, Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, pp. 130-141, (2002)
  • [4] Elkington J., Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of the 21st Century, (1998)
  • [5] Giddings B., Hopwood B., O'Brien G., Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development, Sustainable Development, 10, pp. 187-196, (2002)
  • [6] Hutchins M.J., Sutherland J.W., An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, pp. 1688-1698, (2008)
  • [7] Lambert D.M., Cooper M.C., Pagh J.D., Supply chain management: Implementation issues and research opportunities, The International of Logistics Management, 9, 2, pp. 1-19, (1998)
  • [8] Maslow A., A theory of human motivation, Psychological Review, 50, pp. 370-396, (1943)
  • [9] Max-Neef M., Development and human needs, Real-Life Economics: Understanding Wealth Creation, pp. 197-213, (1992)
  • [10] Mentzer J.T., Dewitt W., Keebler J.S., Min S., Nix N.W., Smith C.D., Zacharia Z.G., Defining supply chain management, Journal of Business Logistics, 22, pp. 1-25, (2001)
12