Bibliometric Analysis of Scholarly Publications on the Zika Virus, 1952–2016

被引:9
作者
Delwiche F.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dana Medical Library, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
关键词
Bibliometrics; journal productivity; scholarly literature; Zika Virus; ZIKV;
D O I
10.1080/0194262X.2018.1431589
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The 2015–2016 epidemic in the Americas caused by the Zika Virus (ZIKV) triggered a dramatic increase in the number of scholarly publications on this topic. In an effort to understand and characterize this body of literature, a bibliometric study was conducted on all articles found in PubMed that were published on ZIKV between 1952 and 2016. Study parameters included publication date, source journal, subject and category of source journal, and country of first author. The data was frequency-ranked, enabling identification of the most highly productive journal titles, subject areas, and countries. The study concluded with a comparison between the number of opinion pieces versus research articles published on ZIKV and five other emerging infectious diseases. Results of the study will be of interest to students, researchers, and librarians and information science professionals, and will serve as a baseline for subsequent analyses. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC © 2018 Frances A. Delwiche.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 129
页数:16
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Albuquerque P.C., Castro M.J., Santos-Gandelman J., Oliveira A.C., Peralta J.M., Rodrigues M.L., Bibliometric indicators of the Zika outbreak, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 11, 1, (2017)
[2]  
Andres A., Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study, (2009)
[3]  
Bradford S.C., Documentation, (1950)
[4]  
Crawley-Low J., Bibliometric analysis of the American Journal of Veterinary Research to produce a list of core veterinary medicine journals, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94, 4, pp. 430-434, (2006)
[5]  
Cruz-Calderon S., Nasner-Posso K.M., Alfaro-Toloza P., Paniz-Mondolfi A.E., Rodriguez-Morales A.J., A bibliometric analysis of global Ebola research, Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 13, 2, pp. 202-204, (2015)
[6]  
Culquichicon C., Cardona-Ospina J.A., Patino-Barbosa A.M., Rodriguez-Morales A.J., Bibliometric analysis of oropouche research: Impact on the surveillance of emerging arboviruses in Latin America, F1000Research, 6, (2017)
[7]  
Davis P.M., Where to spend our e-journal money? Defining a university library’s core collection through citation analysis, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2, 1, pp. 155-166, (2002)
[8]  
Dick G.W., Kitchen S.F., Haddow A.J., Zika Virus. I. Isolations and serological specificity, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 46, 5, pp. 509-520, (1952)
[9]  
Duffy M.R., Chen T.H., Hancock W.T., Powers A.M., Kool J.L., Lanciotti R.S., Pretrick M., Marfel M., Holzbauer S., Dubray C., Guillaumot L., Griggs A., Bel M., Lambert A.J., Laven J., Kosoy O., Panella A., Biggerstaff B.J., Fischer M., Hayes E.B., Zika Virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia, New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 24, pp. 2536-2543, (2009)
[10]  
Garg K.C., Kumar S., Bibliometrics of global ebola virus disease research as seen through science citation index expanded during 1987-2015, Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 16, pp. 64-65, (2017)