Does environmental policy stringency reduce trade in energy resources? Insights from coal, petroleum, and gas

被引:10
|
作者
Usman A. [1 ]
Ullah S. [2 ]
Ozturk I. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Sohail S. [6 ]
Sohail M.T. [7 ]
机构
[1] Department of Economics, Government College University, Faisalabad
[2] Adnan Kassar School of Business, Lebanese American University, Beirut
[3] College of Business Administration, University of Sharjah, Sharjah
[4] Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Nisantasi University, Istanbul
[5] Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung
[6] Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), Islamabad
[7] Centre for Sustainable Energy and Economic Development, Gulf University for Science and Technology
关键词
Coal; Energy resources; Environmental policy stringency; Gas; Nonlinear CS-ARDL; Oil; Trade;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104679
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Stringent Environmental policies are widely acknowledged as a significant policy option to control the harmful effects of environmental degradation. Restricting trade in energy commodities helps reduce the consumption of fossil fuels and thus improve environmental quality. Within the framework of new trade theory, the analysis intends to investigate the influence of environmental policy stringency on trade in conventional energy commodities (coal, petroleum, and gas) in the top polluted economies of the world from 1991 to 2021. Additionally, the study uses the asymmetry assumption compared to earlier research. For empirical investigation, the analysis applied the novel nonlinear CS-ARDL model that can deal with the issue of cross-sectional dependence and provide robust short and long-run estimates. Findings of the nonlinear model suggest that a positive shock in environmental policy stringency restricts trade in energy commodities in the long run, whereas a negative shock in environmental policy stringency does not exert any noticeable effect on these commodities. In the short run, a positive shock in environmental policy stringency exhibits significantly negative effects in mostly energy commodities. Energy demand and financial development promote trade in energy commodities in the nonlinear model, and the real exchange rate restricts trade in these commodities. Thus, policymakers should introduce strict environmental policies to limit the consumption of fossil fuels and promote clean and green energy sources and sustainable development. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DO ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY STRINGENCY AND INNOVATION REDUCE CARBON EMISSIONS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM G-7 COUNTRIES
    Guler, Cengizhan
    Dogan, Basak Ozarslan
    KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI IKTISADI VE IDARI BILIMLER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2023, 14 (28): : 847 - 870
  • [22] Trade-off between environmental sustainability and economic growth through coal consumption and natural resources exploitation in China: New policy insights from wavelet local multiple correlation
    Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday
    GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 58 (04) : 1384 - 1400
  • [23] The transition of renewable energy and ecological sustainability through environmental policy stringency: Estimations from advance panel estimators
    Wang, Zhuo
    Yen-Ku, Kuo
    Li, Zeyun
    Nguyen Binh An
    Abdul-Samad, Zulkiflee
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 188 : 70 - 80
  • [24] The impact of environmental policy stringency and oil prices on innovation: Evidence from the new energy vehicle industry in China
    Huangfu, Jianhua
    Wei, Weixian
    Yu, Lei
    Li, Guoliang
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2025, 85 : 979 - 996
  • [25] Does the Urban Agglomeration Policy Reduce Energy Intensity? Evidence from China
    Ding, Rui
    Zhou, Tao
    Yin, Jian
    Zhang, Yilin
    Shen, Siwei
    Fu, Jun
    Du, Linyu
    Du, Yiming
    Chen, Shihui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (22)
  • [26] Does green environmental policy promote renewable energy consumption in BRICST? Fresh insights from panel quantile regression
    Li, Xiaolong
    Ozturk, Ilknur
    Syed, Qasim Raza
    Hafeez, Muhammad
    Sohail, Sidra
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 5807 - 5823
  • [27] Does Trade Policy Uncertainty Exacerbate Environmental Pollution?-Evidence from Chinese Cities
    Sun, Yiping
    Li, Xiangyi
    Zhang, Tengyuan
    Fu, Jiawei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (04)
  • [28] Induced innovation in clean energy technologies from foreign environmental policy stringency? (vol 147, pg 198, 2019)
    Herman, Kyle S.
    Xiang, Jun
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 151
  • [29] How Does Environmental Policy Stringency Affect Inefficiency of Firms? New Evidence from International Firm-Level Data
    Honma S.
    Hu J.-L.
    Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2024, 4 (2): : 1539 - 1558
  • [30] From public policy towards the green energy transition: Do economic freedom, economic globalization, environmental policy stringency, and material productivity matter?
    Aydin, Mehmet
    Degirmenci, Tunahan
    Erdem, Azad
    Sogut, Yasin
    Demirtas, Nazli
    ENERGY, 2024, 311