Modelling of Wind Power Uncertainty Considering Heteroskedasticity Effect and Its Application in Power System Dispatching

被引:0
|
作者
Li L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Miao S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tu Q. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Duan S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan
[2] State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Wuhan
[3] Key Laboratory of Electric Power Security and High Efficiency of Hubei Province (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Wuhan
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA); Dynamic Copula; Forecasting error; Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH); Unit commitment;
D O I
10.7500/AEPS20190430016
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As the penetration rate of wind power in the power system continues to increase, its uncertainty poses a great challenge to the safe and economic operation of the power system. In order to obtain accurate wind power uncertainty model and help operators to achieve safe and economic operation of the system, this paper proposes a conditional probability distribution modelling method of wind power forecasting error considering the heteroskedasticity effect. Firstly, the dependence of wind power forecasting error and various factors is analyzed. Based on the results and the dynamic Copula theory, a dynamic dependence model of wind power forecast error is established. Then, based on the time-domain features displayed by the edge distribution, combined with the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model and the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model, this paper develops a time-varying edge distribution model with the consideration of heteroskedasticity effect. Finally, the two models are combined to give the forecasting error distribution of wind power conditions at different fluctuation levels, and the verification is performed in the uncertain unit combination model, which proves the validity of the model. © 2020 Automation of Electric Power Systems Press.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 47
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Shu Y., Zhang Z., Guo J., Et al., Study on key factors and solution of renewable energy accommodation, Proceedings of the CSEE, 37, 1, pp. 1-9, (2017)
  • [2] Troy N., Denny E., O'Malley M., Base-load cycling on a system with significant wind penetration, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 25, 2, pp. 1088-1097, (2010)
  • [3] Ran X., Miao S., Liu Y., Et al., Modeling of economic dispatch of power system considering joint effect of wind power, solar energy and load, Proceedings of the CSEE, 34, 16, pp. 2552-2560, (2014)
  • [4] Zhao D., Yan J., Fuzzy random chance constrained preemptive goal programming scheduling model considering source-side and load-side uncertainty, Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 33, 5, pp. 1076-1085, (2018)
  • [5] Bludszuweit H., Dominguez-Navarro J.A., Llombart A., Statistical analysis of wind power forecast error, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 23, 3, pp. 983-991, (2008)
  • [6] Hodge B.M.S., Ela E.G., Milligan M., Characterizing and modeling wind power forecast errors from operational systems for use in wind integration planning studies, Wind Engineering, 36, 5, pp. 509-524, (2012)
  • [7] Bruninx K., Delarue E., A statistical description n of the error on wind power forecasts for probabilistic reserve sizing, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 5, 3, pp. 995-1002, (2014)
  • [8] Lange M., On the uncertainty of wind power predictions-analysis of the forecast accuracy and statistical distribution of errors, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 127, 2, pp. 177-184, (2005)
  • [9] Pinson P., Kariniotakis G., Conditional prediction intervals of wind power generation, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 25, 4, pp. 1845-1856, (2010)
  • [10] Menemenlis N., Huneault M., Robitaille A., Computation of dynamic operating balancing reserve for wind power integration for the time-horizon 1-48 hours, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 3, 4, pp. 692-702, (2012)