The contribution of management of change to process safety accident in the chemical process industry

被引：0

作者：

Piong H.S. ^{[1
]}

Chin K.Y. ^{[1
]}

Bakar H.T.A. ^{[1
]}

Ling C.H. ^{[1
]}

Kidam K. ^{[1
,2
]}

Ali M.W. ^{[1
,2
]}

Hassim M.H. ^{[1
,2
]}

Kamarden H. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

[2] Center of Hydrogen Energy, Institute of Future Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

来源：

Kidam, Kamarizan (kamarizan@utm.my) | 2017年 / Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC卷 / 56期

关键词：

Accident statistic - Chemical process industry - Chemical safety and hazard investigation boards - Continuous improvements - Data mining methods - Management of change - Process safety management - Safety; health and environments;

D O I：

10.3303/CET1756228

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Management of Change (MOC) is a process for evaluating and controlling modifications to facility design, operation, organisation, or activities. It is one of the most important elements of Process Safety Management (PSM). In chemical process industries (CPI), MOC is required to ensure that safety, health and environment are controlled. In recent years, the number of accidents related to MOC failure is significant and caused by the lacks of MOC management, organisation safety culture, design failure, incompetency, human factor and etc. From the accident statistics published by Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB-US), European Major Accident Reporting System (EMARS-European), Failure Knowledge Database (FKD-Japan) and Accident Reporting Information Analysis (ARIA-France), MOC contributes significantly to the occurrence of accidents and its percentage contribution to accident rate is not decreasing over the past 20 years. In this paper, the contribution of MOC failure to accidents and their main failure factor are identified from the study of over thousands of accident cases and analysed with data mining method. Study revealed the major factor of MOC failure are the lack of organisation commitment, lack of experience, limitation of resources, inadequate of HAZOP study, human factor, safety culture and etc. Good practice of MOC has to be inculcated in CPI through learning from past accident and continuous improvement of MOC system. Copyright © 2017, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l..

引用

页码：1363 / 1368

页数：5

共 12 条

[1] Guidelines for the Management of Change for Process Safety, (2008)
[2] Chosnek J., Managing management of change, Process Safety Process, 29, 4, pp. 384-386, (2010)
[3] Dawson D., Brooks B., Report of the Longford Royal Commission: The Esso Longford Gas Plant Accident, (1990)
[4] European major accident reporting system, Major Accident Hazards Bureau, (2015)
[5] Gambetti F., Casalli A., Chisari V., Rico-Ramirez V., Why sometimes may be neglected management of change, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 31, pp. 553-558, (2013)
[6] Failure knowledge database, Japan and Science Technology Agency, (2015)
[7] Kitajima T., Fuchino T., Shimada Y., Naka Y., A new scheme for management-of-change support based on HAZOP Log, Computer Aided Process Engineering, 28, pp. 163-168, (2010)
[8] Process Safety Management, (2000)
[9] Rainer H., MOC scoping-ensuring that MOC action items are correctly and completely described, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26, pp. 499-510, (2012)
[10] US chemical safety and hazard investigation board, Safety Bulletin: Management of Change, (2001)

← 1 2 →