WATER REPELLENCY OF TWO FOREST SOILS AFTER BIOCHAR ADDITION

被引:5
作者
Page-Dumroese, D. S. [1 ]
Robichaud, P. R. [1 ]
Brown, R. E. [1 ]
Tirocke, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, USDA, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Moscow, ID USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Biochar; Black carbon; Carbon sequestration; Hydrophobicity; Infiltration rate; FIRE; ATTRIBUTES; BENEFITS; CHARCOAL; BIOMASS; IMPACT; ENERGY; TIMBER; PINE;
D O I
10.13031/trans.58.10586
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Practical application of black carbon (biochar) to improve forest soil may be limited because biochar is hydrophobic. In a laboratory, we tested the water repellency of biochar application (mixed or surface applied) to two forest soils of varying texture (a granitic coarse-textured Inceptisol and an ash cap fine-textured Andisol) at four different application rates (0, 1, 5, and 10 Mg ha(-1)) and five soil moisture contents (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of saturation). To address the impact of biochar on water infiltration into the soil, we measured soil water repellency using three methods (tension infiltrometer, water drop penetration, and molarity of ethanol). Generally, all three infiltration methods gave similar results. Compared to the unamended coarse-textured Inceptisol at 0% saturation (oven dry), biochar mixed into the soil at the rate of 5 Mg ha(-1) did not result in a significant change (p <= 0.05) in infiltration rate. The fine-textured Andisol soil at 0% saturation did not show a significant change in infiltration at the application rate of 1 Mg ha(-1) when biochar was mixed into the soil. Surface applications of biochar on both soil textures resulted in less water infiltration than the mixing treatments. Our results suggest that biochar decreases infiltration rates less on coarse-textured forest soils as compared to finer-textured soils, and 1 to 5 Mg ha(-1) will likely not detrimentally alter water infiltration rates.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 342
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Guidelines for harvesting forest biomass for energy: A synthesis of environmental considerations [J].
Abbas, Dalia ;
Current, Dean ;
Phillips, Michael ;
Rossman, Richard ;
Hoganson, Howard ;
Brooks, Kenneth N. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (11) :4538-4546
[2]   Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil [J].
Abel, Stefan ;
Peters, Andre ;
Trinks, Steffen ;
Schonsky, Horst ;
Facklam, Michael ;
Wessolek, Gerd .
GEODERMA, 2013, 202 :183-191
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Research Paper PSW-GTR-46
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, KEYS SOIL TAX
[5]   Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield [J].
Asai, Hidetoshi ;
Samson, Benjamin K. ;
Stephan, Haefele M. ;
Songyikhangsuthor, Khamdok ;
Homma, Koki ;
Kiyono, Yoshiyuki ;
Inoue, Yoshio ;
Shiraiwa, Tatsuhiko ;
Horie, Takeshi .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2009, 111 (1-2) :81-84
[6]   Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review [J].
Atkinson, Christopher J. ;
Fitzgerald, Jean D. ;
Hipps, Neil A. .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2010, 337 (1-2) :1-18
[7]   Structural Characterization of Hydrothermal Carbon Spheres by Advanced Solid-State MAS 13C NMR Investigations [J].
Baccile, Niki ;
Laurent, Guillaume ;
Babonneau, Florence ;
Fayon, Franck ;
Titirici, Maria-Magdalena ;
Antonietti, Markus .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C, 2009, 113 (22) :9644-9654
[8]   MACROPORES AND WATER-FLOW IN SOILS [J].
BEVEN, K ;
GERMANN, P .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1982, 18 (05) :1311-1325
[9]   Physical and Chemical Properties of Pinus ponderosa Charcoal: Implications for Soil Modification [J].
Briggs, Christopher ;
Breiner, Joan M. ;
Graham, Robert C. .
SOIL SCIENCE, 2012, 177 (04) :263-268
[10]  
Brock J.H., 1990, General Technical Report RM, P206