Influencing Factors of the Quality of MOOCs Based on the KANO Model

被引：0

作者：

Chen H. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Mathematics Education, Zhumadian Preschool Education College, Zhumadian

来源：

International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning | 2023年 / 18卷 / 17期

关键词：

influencing factors of course quality; KANO model; MOOC; online comment analysis; quality improvement;

D O I：

10.3991/ijet.v18i17.42507

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) represent a new online course and teaching mode, offering targeted instruction and timely services to learners. They have become a key direction for reforming online education. Although MOOCs have experienced significant growth in recent years, the quality of courses published on platforms varies greatly, and scientific quality evaluation mechanisms are lacking. Existing studies on online course quality have primarily relied on questionnaire survey data. In the online environment, an abundance of comment data on platforms reflects learners’ perceptions of course quality, and an analysis mode based on learning comments can address the limitations of questionnaire surveys effectively. In this study, comment texts from learners on Chinese university MOOC platforms were chosen as research data. The influencing factors of online open-course quality were analyzed using the KANO model combined with the ordinal Logit regression method. Results demonstrate that system features, video production, teaching level of teachers, usefulness of teaching content, and comprehensiveness of teaching content are essential quality factors. Course-supporting information is considered an expectant quality factor. Teachers’ teaching style and course interaction are categorized as engaging quality factors. This study provides valuable insights for improving MOOC quality in Chinese universities. © 2023 by the authors of this article. Published under CC-BY.

引用

页码：20 / 32

页数：12

共 23 条

[1]

Huang W, Kaminski B., Luo J., Huang X., Li J., Ross A., Wright J., An D., SMART: Design and evaluation of a collaborative museum visiting application, Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering 2015, 9320, (2015)

[2]

Ok M.W., Kim M.K., Kang E.Y., Bryant B.R., How to find good apps: An evaluation rubric for instructional apps for teaching students with learning disabilities, Intervention in School & Clinic, 51, 4, pp. 244-252, (2016)

[3]

Rosewell J., Jansen D., The OpenupEd quality label: Benchmarks for MOOCs, International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 2, 3, pp. 88-100, (2014)

[4]

Kenteris M., Gavalas D., Economou D., Electronic mobileguides: A survey, Personal & Ubiquitous Computing, 15, 1, pp. 97-111, (2011)

[5]

Wu K., Academic libraries in the age of MOOCs, Reference Services Review, 41, 3, pp. 576-587, (2013)

[6]

Zhang D., Adipat B., Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 3, pp. 293-308, (2005)

[7]

Kjeldskov J., Stage J., New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 5-6, pp. 599-620, (2004)

[8]

Shahin A., Akasheh S., Classifying customer requirements using Kano model and Kano map: The case of hospital services, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 4, pp. 500-515, (2017)

[9]

Kametani T., Nishina K., Suzuki K., Attractive quality and must-be quality from the viewpoint of environmental lifestyle in Japan, Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control, 9, pp. 315-327, (2010)

[10]

Knop K., Evaluation of quality of services provided by transport & logistics operator from pharmaceutical industry for improvement purposes, Transportation Research Procedia, 40, pp. 1080-1087, (2019)

← 1 2 3 →