Open access: The whipping boy for problems in scholarly communication—A response to the rebuttals

被引:0
|
作者
Kingsley, Danny A. [1 ,2 ]
Kennan, Mary Anne [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, Australian National University
[2] School of Information Studies, Charles Stuart University
[3] School of Information Systems, Technology and Management, University of New South Wales
来源
Communications of the Association for Information Systems | 2015年 / 37卷
关键词
Article processing charges; Hybrid publishing; Institutional repositories; Mega journals; Open access; Predatory publishing; Scholarly publishing; Subscriptions;
D O I
10.17705/1cais.03720
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we respond to five rebuttals to Kingsley and Kennan (2015). Four researchers in the information systems field and a university library director of research infrastructure provided these rebuttals. Almost without exception, the rebuttals from the information systems researchers take an analytical approach to the question of scholarly communication in their field. However, in undertaking their individual analyses of scholarly publishing or communication, they do not directly address the issues raised in our original debate piece. The rebuttal from the university library administrator (Groenewegen, 2015) alone directly addresses the discussion points raised in the original debate. As researchers in the field of scholarly communications, while this was not how we originally envisione d the debate, the rebuttals as a body of work have opened up some interesting themes, which we explore in addition to responding to the individual rebuttals. © 2015 by the Association for Information Systems.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 394
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Academic communities The role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication
    Wakeling, Simon
    Spezi, Valerie
    Fry, Jenny
    Creaser, Claire
    Pinfield, Stephen
    Willett, Peter
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2019, 75 (01) : 120 - 139
  • [22] Reaping the benefits of open science in scholarly communication
    Ciriminna, Rosaria
    Scurria, Antonino
    Gangadhar, Sumalatha
    Chandha, Saikiran
    Pagliaro, Mario
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (12)
  • [23] Open access movement in the scholarly world: Pathways for libraries in developing countries
    Sheikh, Arslan
    Richardson, Joanna
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2023,
  • [24] Charting the Open Access scholarly journals landscape in the UAE
    Boufarss, Mohamed
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2020, 122 (03) : 1707 - 1725
  • [25] Charting the Open Access scholarly journals landscape in the UAE
    Mohamed Boufarss
    Scientometrics, 2020, 122 : 1707 - 1725
  • [26] Russian Scholarly Papers in Open-Access Megajournals
    Domnina, T. N.
    SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2020, 47 (03) : 181 - 193
  • [27] A Study of Innovative Features in Scholarly Open Access Journals
    Bjoerk, Bo-Christer
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (04)
  • [28] Scholarly publication, open access and the commons
    Ballantyne, Neil
    CRITICAL AND RADICAL SOCIAL WORK, 2022, 10 (03) : 469 - 483
  • [29] Open Access Scholarly Publications as OER
    Anderson, Terry
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2013, 14 (02): : 81 - 95
  • [30] Net benefit of scholarly communication and a new framework for analyzing the pros and cons of Open Access
    Ning, Bi
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN-CHINESE, 2022, 67 (28-29): : 3367 - 3371