Performance analysis of continuous black-box optimization algorithms via footprints in instance space

被引:0
作者
Muñoz M.A. [1 ]
Smith-Miles K.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, VIC
来源
| 1600年 / MIT Press Journals卷 / 25期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Algorithm selection; Black-box continuous optimization; Exploratory landscape analysis; Footprint analysis; Performance prediction;
D O I
10.1162/EVCO_a_00194
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article presents a method for the objective assessment of an algorithm’s strengths and weaknesses. Instead of examining the performance of only one or more algorithms on a benchmark set, or generating custom problems that maximize the performance difference between two algorithms, ourmethod quantifies both the nature of the test instances and the algorithm performance. Our aim is to gather information about possible phase transitions in performance, that is, the points in which a small change in problem structure produces algorithm failure. The method is based on the accurate estimation and characterization of the algorithm footprints, that is, the regions of instance space in which good or exceptional performance is expected from an algorithm. A footprint can be estimated for each algorithm and for the overall portfolio. Therefore, we select a set of features to generate a common instance space,which we validate by constructing a sufficiently accurate prediction model. We characterize the footprints by their area and density. Our method identifies complementary performance between algorithms, quantifies the common features of hard problems, and locates regions where a phase transition may lie. © 2017 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 554
页数:25
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [41] Posik P., Huyer W., Restarted local search algorithms for continuous black box optimization, Evolutionary Computation, 20, 4, pp. 575-607, (2012)
  • [42] Rice J., The algorithm selection problem, Advances in Computers, 15, pp. 65-118, (1976)
  • [43] Rios L.M., Sahinidis N.V., Derivative-free optimization: A review of algorithms and comparison of software implementations, Journal of Global Optimization, 56, 3, pp. 1247-1293, (2013)
  • [44] Ros R., Benchmarking the BFGS algorithm on the BBOB-2009 function testbed, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO ’09), pp. 2409-2414, (2009)
  • [45] Ros R., Real-Parameter Black-Box Optimisation: Benchmarking and Designing Algorithms, (2009)
  • [46] Rowe J., Vose M., Wright A., Reinterpreting no free lunch, Evolutionary Computation, 17, 1, pp. 117-129, (2009)
  • [47] Schumacher C., Vose M., Whitley L., The no free lunch and problem description length, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO ’01), pp. 565-570, (2001)
  • [48] Seo D., Moon B., An information-theoretic analysis on the interactions of variables in combinatorial optimization problems, Evolutionary Computation, 15, 2, pp. 169-198, (2007)
  • [49] Smith-Miles K., Cross-disciplinary perspectives on meta-learning for algorithm selection, ACM Computing Surveys, 41, 1, pp. 1-6, (2009)
  • [50] Smith-Miles K., Baatar D., Wreford B., Lewis R., Towards objective measures of algorithm performance across instance space, Computers & Operations Research, 45, pp. 12-24, (2014)