Performance analysis of continuous black-box optimization algorithms via footprints in instance space

被引:0
作者
Muñoz M.A. [1 ]
Smith-Miles K.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, VIC
来源
| 1600年 / MIT Press Journals卷 / 25期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Algorithm selection; Black-box continuous optimization; Exploratory landscape analysis; Footprint analysis; Performance prediction;
D O I
10.1162/EVCO_a_00194
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article presents a method for the objective assessment of an algorithm’s strengths and weaknesses. Instead of examining the performance of only one or more algorithms on a benchmark set, or generating custom problems that maximize the performance difference between two algorithms, ourmethod quantifies both the nature of the test instances and the algorithm performance. Our aim is to gather information about possible phase transitions in performance, that is, the points in which a small change in problem structure produces algorithm failure. The method is based on the accurate estimation and characterization of the algorithm footprints, that is, the regions of instance space in which good or exceptional performance is expected from an algorithm. A footprint can be estimated for each algorithm and for the overall portfolio. Therefore, we select a set of features to generate a common instance space,which we validate by constructing a sufficiently accurate prediction model. We characterize the footprints by their area and density. Our method identifies complementary performance between algorithms, quantifies the common features of hard problems, and locates regions where a phase transition may lie. © 2017 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 554
页数:25
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Auger A., Doerr B., Theory of Randomized Search Heuristics, (2011)
  • [2] Auger A., Hansen N., Benchmarking the (1+1)-CMA-ES on the BBOB-2009 function testbed, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO ’09), pp. 2459-2466, (2009)
  • [3] Auger A., Teytaud O., Continuous lunches are free plus the design of optimal optimization algorithms, Algorithmica, 57, 1, pp. 121-146, (2010)
  • [4] Bartz-Beielstein T., Experimental Research in Evolutionary Computation, (2006)
  • [5] Bischl B., Mersmann O., Trautmann H., Preuss M., Algorithm selection based on exploratory landscape analysis and cost-sensitive learning, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO ’12), pp. 313-320, (2012)
  • [6] Blum C., Puchinger J., Raidl G., Roli A., Hybrid metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: A survey, Applied Soft Computing, 11, 6, pp. 4135-4151, (2011)
  • [7] Chang C., Lin C., LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems Technology, 2, pp. 1-27, (2011)
  • [8] Corne D., Reynolds A., Optimisation and generalisation: Footprints in instance space, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, 6238, pp. 22-31, (2010)
  • [9] Crepinsek M., Liu S., Mernik L., A note on teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm, Information Sciences, 212, pp. 79-93, (2012)
  • [10] De Corte A., Sorensen K., Optimisation of gravity-fed water distribution network design: A critical review, European Journal of Operational Research, 228, 1, pp. 1-10, (2013)