Seismic analysis on mid-rise cold-formed steel structure with reinforced end studs

被引:0
|
作者
Wang X. [1 ]
Ye J. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing
[2] State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics & Deep Underground Engineering (China University of Mining and Technology), Xuzhou, 221116, Jiangsu
来源
Ye, Jihong (jhye@cumt.edu.cn) | 2017年 / Harbin Institute of Technology卷 / 49期
关键词
Concrete-filled rectangular steel tube column; Lateral design objectives; Mid-rise CFS structure; Seismic performance; Simplified calculation;
D O I
10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201701036
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mid-rise cold-formed steel (CFS) structure with reinforced end studs can promote the development of mid-rise CFS residential buildings from low-rise ones. To analyze the dynamic characteristics of mid-rise CFS residential structures with reinforced end studs under earthquakes, a simplified calculation model of CFS shear wall with reinforced end studs, which is the main lateral load-bearing structural component of the structure, was proposed. The proposed model could consider the real behavior of beam-column joint, and then the seismic calculation model of the whole structure was further obtained. Lateral design objectives for the structure under earthquake were proposed according to abroad specification and previous shear wall test results that performed by authors, and seismic analysis on a mid-rise CFS structure with reinforced end studs was carried out. The results show that equivalent-bracing model considering the mechanical behavior of beam-column joint can precisely predict the seismic performance of the structure. It is safe and reliable that 1/300 and 1/75 being taken as the elastic and inelastic storey drift limits of the structure under frequent and severe earthquake, respectively. Mid-rise CFS structure with reinforced end studs will not collapse under severe earthquake with a degree of 9. It is not suitable to adopt shear wall combination with large difference in stiffness between two directions, and the shear strength of the walls along the direction with larger opening rate should be strengthened emphatically. In areas of particularly high seismicity, both shear strength of the wall and vertical bearing capacity of end studs should be taken into account to avoid overall failure, which is caused by end studs' buckling. © 2017, Editorial Board of Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 23
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Chen W., Ye J., Bai Y., Et al., Full-scale fire experiments on load-bearing cold-formed steel walls lined with different panels, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 79, pp. 242-254, (2012)
  • [2] Wang X., Ye J., Reversed cyclic performance of cold-formed steel shear walls with reinforced end studs, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 113, pp. 28-42, (2015)
  • [3] Wang X., Ye J., Cyclic testing of two- and three-story CFS shear-walls with reinforced end studs, Journal of Construction Steel Research, 121, pp. 13-28, (2016)
  • [4] Fulop L.A., Dubina D., Performance of wall-stud cold-formed shear panels under monotonic and cyclic loading Part II: Numerical modeling and performance analysis, Thin-Walled Structures, 42, pp. 339-349, (2004)
  • [5] Landolfo R., Fiorino L., Corte G.D., Seismic behaviour of sheathed cold-formed structures: physical tests, Journal of Structure Engineering, 132, 4, pp. 570-581, (2006)
  • [6] Buonopane S.G., Bian G., Tunt H., Et al., Computationally efficient fastener-based models of cold-formed steel shear walls with wood sheathing, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 110, pp. 137-148, (2015)
  • [7] Ye J., Wang X., Piecewise function hysteretic model for cold-formed steel shear walls with reinforced end studs, Applied Sciences, 7, 1, (2017)
  • [8] Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures: SEI 7-10, (2010)
  • [9] Dubina D., Behavior and performance of cold-formed steel-framed houses under seismic action, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 64, 7, pp. 896-913, (2008)
  • [10] Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings: FEMA 356, (2000)