Computational performance comparison of multiple regression analysis, artificial neural network and machine learning models in turning of GFRP composites with brazed tungsten carbide tipped tool

被引:0
作者
Gadagi A.A. [1 ]
Adake B.C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Dr. M. S. Sheshgiri College of Engineering & Technology, Karnataka, Belagavi
来源
Journal of Computational and Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering | 2022年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
Machine learning; Machining; Neural networks; Regression analysis;
D O I
10.22061/JCARME.2022.8684.2164
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In a turning process, it is essential to predict and choose appropriate process parameters to get a component’s proper surface roughness (Ra). In this paper, the prediction of Ra through the artificial neural network (ANN), multiple regression analysis (MRA), and random forest method (machine learning) are made and compared. Using the process variables such as feed rate, spindle speed, and depth of cut, the turning process of glass fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP) composite specimens is conducted on a conventional lathe with the help of a single-point HSS turning tool brazed with a carbide tip. The surface roughness of turned GFRP components is measured experimentally using the Talysurf method. By utilizing Taguchi's L27 array, the experiments are carried out and the experimental results are utilized in the development of MRA, ANN, and random forest method models for predicting the Ra. It is observed that the mean absolute error (MAE) of MRA, ANN and random forest for the training cases are found to be 39.33%, 0.56%, and 24.88%, respectively whereas for the test cases MAE is 54.34%, 2.59%, and 24.88% for MRA, ANN, and random forest, respectively. © 2021 The author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 143
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Hull D. T., Clyne W., An introduction to composite materials, (1996)
  • [2] Rajasekaran T., Palanikumar K., Vinayagam B. K., Turning CFRP composites with Ceramic tool for Surface Roughness Analysis, Procedia Eng, 38, 1, pp. 2922-2929, (2012)
  • [3] Sarma P. M. M. S., Karunamoorthy L., Palanikumar K., Surface Roughness Parameters Evaluation in Machining GFRP Composites by PCD Tool using Digital Image Processing, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos, 28, 13, pp. 1567-1585, (2009)
  • [4] Palanikumar K., Latha B., Senthilkumar V. S., Davim J. P., Analysis on Drilling of Glass Fiber–Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Composites Using Grey Relational Analysis, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 27, 3, pp. 297-305, (2012)
  • [5] Prashanth I. S. N. V. R., Chandra Mouli B., Critical Analysis in Milling of GFRP Composites by Various End Mill Tools, Mater. Today. Proc, 5, 6, pp. 14607-14617, (2018)
  • [6] Azmi A. I., Lin R. J. T., Bhattacharyya D., Experimental Study of Machinability of GFRP Composites by End Milling, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 27, 10, pp. 1045-1050, (2012)
  • [7] Shivakoti I., Kibria G., Pradhan P. M., Pradhan B. B., Sharma A., ANFIS based prediction and parametric analysis during turning operation of Stainless Steel 202, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 34, 1, pp. 112-121, (2019)
  • [8] Manikandan N., Balasubramanian K., Palanisamy D., Gopal P.M., Arul Kirubakaran D., Bihoj J. S., Machinability analysis and ANFIS modelling on Advanced Machining of Hybrid Metal Matrix composite for Aerospace applications, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 34, 16, pp. 1866-1881, (2019)
  • [9] Balasubramanian K., Nataraj M., Duraisamy P., Machinability analysis and application of response surface approach on CNC turning of Lm6/SiC pcomposites, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 34, 12, pp. 1389-1400, (2019)
  • [10] Varghese V., Ramesh M. K., Chakradhar D., Experimental Investigation and optimization of machining parameters for sustainable machining, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 33, 16, pp. 1782-1792, (2018)