Assessing technologies for information sharing in international research teams: Developing an intercultural heuristic evaluation tool

被引:2
作者
Ward W.S. [1 ]
Given L.M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University
[2] Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology
来源
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 2017年 / 54卷 / 01期
关键词
communication technologies; heuristic evaluation; information behavior; intercultural communication; research collaboration; scholarly communication;
D O I
10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401048
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Collaborative research teams working in developing countries rely on information and computer technologies (ICTs), both hardware and software, to overcome barriers to information sharing including, language, distance, time, economic development and politics. However, studies have shown impediments to information sharing between team members from different cultures, nations and institutions. This paper reports on a study in which a model was developed to highlight the most important barriers for communication and information sharing in international research teams, which was the basis for the development of a heuristic evaluation tool. The communication model was created using the results of 30 semi-structured interviews with agricultural scientists working in international research teams based in Australia and Lao People's Democratic Republic. Interview data outline a number of barriers and facilitators for team communication, which informed the development of eight intercultural heuristics. These were combined with Jakob Nielsen's general usability heuristics to form the intercultural heuristic evaluation tool, or I-CHET. The tool was then tested in a pilot study to assess the utility and usability of two ICTs used by international research teams: email and Skype. The initial assessment using I-CHET showed that while email theoretically lacked the richness of cues seen in Skype, email better complied with the needs of international research groups for sharing information and communicating in multicultural teams dispersed over language, cultural and geographic divides. Copyright © 2017 by Association for Information Science and Technology
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 454
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Azadi T., Eskrootchi R., Jamshidi Orak R., Mohaghegh N., Usability evaluation of the web pages of the Islamic world science citation center (ISC), Islamic Countries SCI database, International Journal of Information Science & Management, 12, 1, pp. 11-22, (2014)
  • [2] Ballantyne P., Maru A., Poncari E.M., Information and communication technologies - opportunities to mobilize agricultural science for development, Crop Science, 50, pp. S63-69, (2010)
  • [3] Charmaz K., Constructing grounded theory, ed, (2014)
  • [4] Chen S.Y., Macredie R.D., The assessment of usability of electronic shopping: A heuristic evaluation, International Journal of Information Management, 25, 6, pp. 516-532, (2005)
  • [5] Clemmensen T., Templates for cross-cultural and culturally specific usability testing: Results from field studies and ethnographic interviewing in three countries, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27, 7, pp. 634-669, (2011)
  • [6] Cyr D., Head M., Larios H., Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: A multi-method evaluation, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 1-2, pp. 1-21, (2010)
  • [7] Daft R.L., Lengel R.H., Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design, Management Science, 32, 5, pp. 554-571, (1986)
  • [8] Dennis A.R., Fuller R.M., Valacich J.S., Media, tasks and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity, MIS Quarterly, 32, 3, pp. 575-600, (2008)
  • [9] Derks D., Bos A.E.R., Grumbkow J.V., Emoticons and social interaction on the internet: The importance of social context, Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1, pp. 842-849, (2007)
  • [10] Dimmick J., Rothenbuhler E., The theory of the niche: Quantifying competition among media industries, Journal of Communication, 34, 1, pp. 103-119, (1984)