Method for Roundness Error Evaluation Based on Minimum Zone Method

被引:4
|
作者
Yue L. [1 ]
Huang Q. [1 ]
Mei J. [1 ]
Cheng R. [1 ]
Zhang L. [1 ]
Chen L. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Instrument Science and Opto-electronics Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei
关键词
Area searching algorithm; Cross structure; Minimum zone; Roundness error;
D O I
10.3901/JME.2020.04.042
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is very important for the quality evaluation of shaft and hole parts to evaluate the roundness error accurately. Aiming at the problems of principle error or model error in the commonly used roundness error evaluation methods, a roundness error evaluation method which fully meets the definition of the minimum zone method is proposed. This method is an evaluation method that combines the area searching algorithm with the geometrical structure evaluated by the minimum zone method of roundness error. The quasi-central center are determined by the area searching algorithm. Then it is judged and adjusted according to the quasi-central center and geometrical structure. Finally, it can accurately find the center of the minimum zone circle. So the exact roundness error of the minimum zone method can be obtained. Several sets of simulation data are constructed. And the validity and correctness of this method are proved by comparing the evaluation results of this method with the preset values. After evaluating other literatures' data and comparing, the results further show that the evaluation results of this method are accurate, reliable, stable and efficient. It can effectively overcome the shortcomings of current roundness error evaluation methods. © 2020 Journal of Mechanical Engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 48
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] DD CEN ISO/TS 12181-1: 2007 Geometrical product specifications(GPS)-roundness-part 1: vocabulary and parameters of roundness, (2008)
  • [2] DD CEN ISO/TS 12181-2: 2007 Geometrical product specifications(GPS)-roundness-part 2: specification operators, (2008)
  • [3] GB/T 7235-2004 Geometrical product specification(GPS)-methods for the assessment of departure from roundness-measurement of variations in radius, (2004)
  • [4] Xu Z., Liu Y., Cheng Q., Analysis of the four kinds of roundness error evaluation methods, Acta Metrologica Sinica, 30, 5, pp. 38-41, (2009)
  • [5] Lei X., Chang W., Xue Y., Et al., Evaluation of roundness error based on mesh search algorithm, Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 29, 11, pp. 2324-2329, (2008)
  • [6] Huang F., Zheng Y., A method for roundness error evaluation based on area hunting, Acta Metrologica Sinica, 29, 2, pp. 117-119, (2008)
  • [7] Zhang C., Lei X., Li J., Et al., Method for roundness error evaluation based on geometry optimization, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 46, 12, pp. 8-12, (2010)
  • [8] Yan L., Yan B., Cai L., Et al., Research on roundness error evaluation of shaft parts based on genetic algorithms with transfer-operator, 20099th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments(ICEMI 2009), pp. 1439-1443, (2009)
  • [9] Wang Y., Uncertainty assessment for roundness error particle swarm optimization(PSO) intelligent evaluation, (2011)
  • [10] Luo J., Lin Y., Liu X., Et al., Research on roundness error evaluation based on the improved artificial bee colony algorithm, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 52, 16, pp. 27-32, (2016)