Traffic engineering for software defined networks

被引：0
作者：
Zhou T.-Q. [1 ]
Cai Z.-P. [1 ]
Xia J. [1 ]
Xu M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Computer, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
来源：
Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software | 2016年 / 27卷 / 02期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Network failure recovery; Software defined network; Traffic engineering; Traffic management; Traffic measurement;
D O I：
10.13328/j.cnki.jos.004935
中图分类号：
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号：
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要：
Software defined network (SDN) is an emerging network paradigm that proposes to decouple the control and data forwarding plane. Leveraging the centralized control ability and open programming interfaces SDN provides, network management can be dramatically simplified, and network services can be dynamically controlled by applications. Traffic engineering (TE) is a category of mechanisms that promises to optimize network performance through analyzing, predicting and regulating data flow in network. The unique features of SDN provide TE with unified and real-time global network view, flexible control manner and better policy for scalable traffic management, exhibiting profound research significance. This paper surveys the state-of-art works on TE for SDN. In terms of the methods, application and deployment of measurement, works on traffic measurement architecture, network invariant detection and measurement resource management with SDN are reviewed. The problems in traditional network traffic management are analyzed, and SDN-based data traffic management methods for efficient load balance and control traffic management methods for centralized bottleneck relief are presented. Moreover, network failure resilience technologies in SDN are described. Finally, the technological approaches are summarized and future research issues are discussed. © Copyright 2016, Institute of Software, the Chinese Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：394 / 417
页数：23
相关论文
共 71 条
[41]  
Li J., Chang X., Ren Y., Zhang Z., Wang G., An effective path load balancing mechanism based on SDN, Proc. of the 13th Int'l Conf. on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom), pp. 527-533, (2014)
[42]  
Handigol N., Seetharaman S., Flajslik M., McKeown N., Johari R., Plug-n-Serve: Load-Balancing Web traffic using OpenFlow, Proc. of the Demo at ACM SIGCOMM
[43]  
Wang R., Butnariu D., Rexford J., OpenFlow-Based server load balancing gone wild, Proc. of the Workshop on Hot-ICE, pp. 12-18, (2011)
[44]  
Tootoonchian A., Ganjali Y., Hyperflow: A distributed control plane for openflow, Proc. of the 2010 Internet Network Man-Agement Conf. on Research on Enterprise Networking, (2010)
[45]  
Tavakoli A., Casado M., Koponen T., Shenker S., Applying nox to the datacenter, Proc. of the HotNets, (2009)
[46]  
Koponen T., Casado M., Gude N., Stribling J., Poutievski L., Zhu M., Ramanathan R., Iwata Y., Inoue H., Hama T., Shenker S., Onix: A distributed control platform for large-scale production networks, Proc. of the OSDI, 10, pp. 1-6, (2010)
[47]  
Hu Y., Wang W., Gong X., Que X., Cheng S., Balanceflow: Con-Troller load balancing for openflow networks, Proc. of the 2nd Int'l Conf. on Cloud Computing and Intelligent Systems (CCIS), 2, pp. 780-785, (2012)
[48]  
Yeganeh S.H., Ganjali Y., Kandoo: A framework for efficient and scalable offloading of control applications, Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Hot topics in Software Defined Networks, pp. 19-24, (2012)
[49]  
Sherwood R., Gibb G., Yap K.K., Appenzeller G., Casado M., McKeown N., Parulkar G., Can the production network be the testbed?, Proc. of the 9th USENIX Conf. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), (2010)
[50]  
Jin X., Rexford J., Walker D., Incremental update for a compositional SDN hypervisor, Proc. of the 3rd Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networking, pp. 187-192, (2014)
12345678