Analysis on the carbon footprint of life cycle for typical steel bridge deck pavement system

被引:0
|
作者
Qian Z. [1 ]
Tang W. [1 ]
Liu Y. [1 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ]
Xie Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Intelligent Transport System Research Center, Southeast University, Nanjing
来源
Dongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition) | 2024年 / 54卷 / 02期
关键词
carbon footprint; life cycle assessment (LCA); steel bridge deck pavement system; traffic delays;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2024.02.009
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To quantify the carbon emissions of steel bridge deck pavement system,a process-based life cycle assessment method was applied to analyze the life cycle carbon footprint of steel bridge deck pavement system. A life cycle inventory database of carbon emissions for steel bridge deck pavement system was constructed through six processes:material production,construction,operation,maintenance,waste disposal and transportation. The international roughness index was used to establish the carbon emission prediction model under the decay of traveling quality. SMUO simulation software for traffic delays simulation was used to establish the carbon emission model of traffic delays. A corresponding carbon footprint quantification framework and model was established,and a case study for typical bridge pavement system of lower EA (epoxy asphalt)+ upper SMA (stone mastic asphalt)was implemented. The results show that the maintenance and operation phases contribute nearly 80% of the total carbon emissions,the additional carbon emissions caused by traffic delays amounts to about 24% of the total carbon emissions,while materials or construction processes such as curing agents and sandblasting rust removal contribute 8. 11% and 5. 42% of the total carbon emissions,respectively. © 2024 Southeast University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 328
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Yu B, Lu Q., Life cycle assessment of pavement:Methodology and case study[J], Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 17, 5, pp. 380-388, (2012)
  • [2] Liu S N, Wang H Z, Zhang L, Et al., Study on carbon emission of epoxy recycled pavement based on LCA [J], Materials Reports, 36, S2, pp. 121-128, (2022)
  • [3] Bo W, Ren H S, Geng W, Et al., Investigation of the environmental impacts of steel deck pavement based on life cycle assessment[J], Journal of Southeast University (English Edition), 36, 3, pp. 334-340, (2020)
  • [4] Sleep S, Dadashi Z, Chen Y L, Et al., Improving robustness of LCA results through stakeholder engagement:A case study of emerging oil sands technologies[J], Jour nal of Cleaner Production, 281, (2021)
  • [5] Chen X D, Wang H., Life cycle assessment of asphalt pavement recycling for greenhouse gas emission with temporal aspect[J], Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, (2018)
  • [6] Zhang J X, Kong X J, Han D D, Et al., Prediction model of asphalt pavement PCI of expressway under different maintenance conditions[J], Journal of Beijing Universi-ty of Technology, 42, 1, pp. 74-80, (2016)
  • [7] Navarro I J, Marti J V, Yepes V., Reliability-based maintenance optimization of corrosion preventive designs under a life cycle perspective[J], Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 74, (2019)
  • [8] Ziyadi M, Ozer H, Kang S, Et al., Vehicle energy consumption and an environmental impact calculation model for the transportation infrastructure systems[J], Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, (2018)
  • [9] Kim R E, Kang S, Spencer B F, Et al., New stochastic approach of vehicle energy dissipation on nondeformable rough pavements[J], Journal of Engineering Mechan-ics, 143, 4, (2016)
  • [10] Cao R J, Leng Z, Hsu S C., Comparative eco-efficiency analysis on asphalt pavement rehabilitation alternatives: Hot in-place recycling and milling-and-filling [J], Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, (2019)