Machine learning (ML) algorithms for seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in high-intensity seismic zones

被引:1
作者
Zain, Muhammad [1 ]
Dackermann, Ulrike [2 ]
Prasittisopin, Lapyote [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Architecture, Ctr Excellent Green Tech Architecture, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Adv Railway Infrastruct Innovat & Syst Engn Res Un, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
关键词
Machine learning; Seismic vulnerability assessment; Seismic analysis; Schools; Earthquakes; DAMAGE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107639
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Ensuring seismic resilience of school buildings is crucial for safeguarding their occupants during earthquakes. This paper focuses on assessing the seismic vulnerability of school buildings constructed in the Kashmir region of Pakistan after the 2005 earthquake, which claimed the lives of 19,000 school-going children. It explores the feasibility of utilizing machine learning (ML) algorithms for enhanced rapid screening of schools to establish fragility information. The study is based on data collected in the Kashmir region and focuses on assessing representative reinforced concrete (RC) and unreinforced masonry (URM) school buildings. To determine structural fragility curves, Incremental Dynamic Analyses (IDA) are performed, simulating fifteen historical earthquakes. Four different ML models are investigated to predict fragility curves, including Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Extremely Randomized Tree Regressor (ERTR). The performance of the algorithms is compared using performance metrics such as precision, accuracy, and f1 score. The study identified XGBoost and RF as the highest performing algorithms, achieving highly satisfactory accuracy with the correlation coefficients of 0.91 and 0.81 for RC schools, and 0.88 and 0.83 for URM schools during testing phases. Alternatively, ERTR's performance could not justify its use for structural seismic vulnerability assessments. This highlights the significant potential of using ML algorithms for automated seismic vulnerability evaluation of buildings, greatly reducing the overall computational burden while maintaining high accuracy and reliability.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [31] MAGENES G., 2006, Masonry building design in seismic areas: recent experiences and prospects from a European standpoint
  • [32] Selection and spectral matching of recorded ground motions for seismic fragility analyses
    Manfredi, Vincenzo
    Masi, Angelo
    Ozcebe, Ali Guney
    Paolucci, Roberto
    Smerzini, Chiara
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 20 (10) : 4961 - 4987
  • [33] Analysis of building damage during the 8 October 2005 earthquake in Pakistan
    Maqsood, S. T.
    Schwarz, J.
    [J]. SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 79 (02) : 163 - 177
  • [34] Ozturk B, 2011, 5 INT C EARTHQ GEOT
  • [35] Ozturk B., 2012, 15 WORLD C EARTHQ EN
  • [36] Compressive strength of concrete material using machine learning techniques
    Paudel, Satish
    Pudasaini, Anil
    Shrestha, Rajesh Kumar
    Kharel, Ekta
    [J]. CLEANER ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 15
  • [37] Prasittisopin L., 2023, INT C CIV ENG ARCH I
  • [38] Machine Learning-Based Fragility Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings
    Rasheed, Abdur
    Usman, Muhammad
    Zain, Muhammad
    Iqbal, Nadeem
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 2022
  • [39] Comparative study of alternative equivalent frame approaches for the seismic assessment of masonry buildings in OpenSees
    Requena-Garcia-Cruz, M. V.
    Cattari, S.
    Bento, R.
    -Esteban, A. Morales
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 66
  • [40] Prediction of local site influence on seismic vulnerability using machine learning: A study of the 6 February 2023 Turkiye earthquakes
    Senkaya, Mustafa
    Silahtar, Ali
    Erkan, Enes Furkan
    Karaaslan, Hasan
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2024, 337