Forecasting crude oil volatility with exogenous predictors: As good as it GETS?

被引:0
作者
Bonnier J.-B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CRESE, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté
[2] LEMNA, Université de Nantes
关键词
Crude oil; Dynamic model averaging; General-to-specific; Volatility forecasting;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106059
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper aims to investigate the usefulness of exogenous predictors to forecast crude oil volatility. We use the recent expansion of the general-to-specific (GETS) procedure to conditionally heteroskedastic models to estimate a parsimonious predictive model of crude oil volatility from a large set of predictors. Our results show that the GETS algorithm achieves good predictive accuracy compared to its competitors at the 1-day horizon. However, this accuracy deteriorates for more distant forecast horizons. We argue that it may be due to the fact that the GETS procedure is based on tests that are key in assessing explanatory power as opposed to reducing expected prediction error. Among its competitors, DMA achieves good predictive power in almost all situations. Still, our analysis provides interesting insights on the variables best suited to forecast crude oil volatility. In particular, forecasters might benefit from better exploiting the predictive content of exchange rates. © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] Aloui R., Gupta R., Miller S.M., Uncertainty and crude oil returns, Energy Econ., 55, pp. 92-100, (2016)
  • [2] Andersen T.G., Bollerslev T., Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts, Internat. Econom. Rev., 39, 4, pp. 885-905, (1998)
  • [3] Andersen T.G., Bollerslev T., Diebold F.X., Ebens H., The distribution of realized stock return volatility, J. Financ. Econ., 61, 1, pp. 43-76, (2001)
  • [4] Bahloul W., Gupta R., Impact of macroeconomic news surprises and uncertainty for major economies on returns and volatility of oil futures, Int. Econ., 156, pp. 247-253, (2018)
  • [5] Baker S., Bloom N., Davis S., Measuring economic policy uncertainty, Q. J. Econ., 131, 4, pp. 1593-1636, (2016)
  • [6] Baker M., Wurgler J., Investor sentiment in the stock market, J. Econ. Perspect., 21, 2, pp. 129-152, (2007)
  • [7] Barberis N., Thaler R., A survey of behavioral finance, Handbook of the Economics of Finance, pp. 1053-1128, (2003)
  • [8] Baumeister C., Kilian L., Forty years of oil price fluctuations: Why the price of oil may still surprise us, J. Econ. Perspect., 30, 1, pp. 139-160, (2016)
  • [9] Baur D.G., Dimpfl T., The asymmetric return-volatility relationship of commodity prices, Energy Econ., 76, pp. 378-387, (2018)
  • [10] Bauwens L., Hafner C., Laurent S., Volatility models, Handbook of Volatility Models and their Applications, pp. 1-45, (2012)