Options-based negotiation management of PPP–BOT infrastructure projects

被引:21
作者
Attarzadeh M. [1 ,2 ]
Chua D.K.H. [1 ]
Beer M. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Abbott E.L.S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore
[2] School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore
[3] Institute for Risk and Reliability, Leibniz Universität Hannover
[4] Institute for Risk and Uncertainty, University of Liverpool, Liverpool
[5] International Joint Research Center for Engineering Reliability and Stochastic Mechanics (ERSM), Tongji University, Shanghai
关键词
build–operate–transfer; negotiation; private finance; public–private partnerships; Real options;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2017.1325962
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The success of public–private partnership (PPP)–build–operate–transfer (BOT) projects largely depends on effectively mitigating the impact of a variety of risks and uncertainties, especially those influencing the revenue over time. Revenue instability is one of the main obstacles of PPP form of procurement. Government support, which is established as a clause in the concession agreement, should be carefully designed and well formulated. Options which arise from certain clauses in the contract are more valuable for risky projects. The purpose of this paper’s proposed model is to evaluate early fund generation options and also to calculate equitable bounds for a guaranteed revenue for the project sponsor under uncertainty and risk. The model is specially designed to alleviate the concern of revenue risk. To illustrate its applicability the methodology is then applied to a freeway PPP project and a power plant PPP project in Iran. The results show that the value of these options can indeed be significant and by applying the proposed systematic negotiation mechanism both public and private sectors can take advantage of its flexibility at the negotiation table. The proposed mechanisms can facilitate negotiations on the verge of a break down as well as accelerating ongoing negotiations that have become moribund. © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 692
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Ashuri B., Et al., Risk-neutral pricing approach for evaluating BOT highway projects with government minimum revenue guarantee options, Journal of construction engineering and management, 138, 4, pp. 545-557, (2012)
[2]  
Attarzadeh M., Economic appraisal of BOT projects-financial risks management model, (2007)
[3]  
Attarzadeh M., Negotiation-based risk management for PPP-BOT infrastructure projects, (2014)
[4]  
Attarzadeh M., Et al., Fuzzy randomness simulation of long term infrastructure projects, ASCE-ASME journal of risk and uncertainty in engineering systems, part a: civil engineering, 3, 3, (2017)
[5]  
Black F., Scholes M., The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, Journal of political economy, 81, 3, pp. 637-654, (1973)
[6]  
Brandao L.E., Saraiva E., The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure projects, Construction management and economics, 26, 11, pp. 1171-1180, (2008)
[7]  
Carbonara N., Costantino N., Pellegrino R., Revenue guarantee in public-private partnerships: A fair risk allocation model, Construction management and economics, 32, 4, pp. 403-415, (2014)
[8]  
Carbonara N., Costantino N., Pellegrino R., Concession period for PPPs: A win–win model for a fair risk sharing, International journal of project management, 32, 7, pp. 1223-1232, (2014)
[9]  
Charoenpornpattana S., Minato T., Nakahama S., Government supports as bundle of real options in built operate transfer highways project, (2003)
[10]  
Cheah C.Y.J., Liu J., Real option evaluation of complex infrastructure projects: The case of dabhol power project in India, Journal of financial management of property and construction, 10, 1, pp. 55-68, (2005)