Urban resilience assessment model for waterlogging disasters and its application

被引:0
|
作者
Li Z. [1 ,2 ]
Fu D. [1 ]
Wang J. [1 ,3 ]
Min K. [1 ]
Zhang J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing
[2] Changzhou Institute of Planning and Design, Changzhou
[3] SEU-Monash Joint Research Center for Future Cities, Suzhou
[4] Department of Water Science and Engineering, IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft
来源
Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University | 2022年 / 62卷 / 02期
关键词
Disaster prevention; Resilience assessment; Urban resilience; Waterlogging disasters;
D O I
10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.22.037
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In traditional disaster prevention and mitigation analyses, risk assessments for waterlogging disasters usually only consider the infrastructure resilience and natural conditions such as weather and terrain. However, with the development of resilience theory, risk assessment and countermeasures should also include flood prevention and control, emergency responses and post-disaster recovery by the government and residents. This paper presents a set of indicators for evaluating the ability of cities to deal with waterlogging disasters, including 41 basic indicators covering 13 aspects incorporated into a resilience assessment model. The resilience assessment model is then applied to Kunshan, a low lying city in Jiangsu Province, China. The results show that the Kunshan High-Tech Zone has the best resilience and the strongest ability to deal with waterlogging disasters. The index system and model evaluation results are used to develop a targeted improvement strategy for areas with poor resilience to waterlogging disasters. © 2022, Tsinghua University Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 276
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] CHEN H L, CHEN G, DING G P., Risk evaluation of regional flood disaster based on GIS, Yangtze River, 34, 6, pp. 49-51, (2003)
  • [2] MOTESHARREI S, RIVAS J, KALNAY E, Et al., Modeling sustainability: Population, inequality, consumption, and bidirectional coupling of the earth and human systems, National Science Review, 3, 4, pp. 470-494, (2016)
  • [3] City resilience framework: The Rockefeller Foundation
  • [4] HUANG H, LI R Q, YU F C, Et al., Discussion on several issues in the construction of safety and resilience city, Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Information & Management Engineering), 42, 2, pp. 93-97, (2020)
  • [5] LI R Q, HUANG H, ZHOU R., Resilience curve modelling of urban safety resilience, Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 60, 1, pp. 1-8, (2020)
  • [6] CHEN C K, CHEN Y Q, SHI B, Et al., A model for evaluating urban resilience to rainstorm flood disasters, China Safety Science Journal, 28, 4, pp. 1-6, (2018)
  • [7] ZHENG Y, ZHAI J Q, WU Z Y, Et al., A typology analysis on resilient cities based on adaptive cycle: Taking cases of Chinese sponge cities and climate resilient cites pilot projects, China Population, Resources and Environment, 28, 3, pp. 31-38, (2018)
  • [8] CHENG Y., Urban resilience assessment and planning path exploration to adapt to rainstorm climate: By the example of Shaanxi, (2019)
  • [9] BALICA S F, WRIGHT N G, VAN DER MEULEN F., A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts, Natural Hazards, 64, 1, pp. 73-105, (2012)
  • [10] ROSENZWEIG C, SOLECKI W., Hurricane Sandy and adaptation pathways in New York: Lessons from a first-responder city, Global Environmental Change, 28, pp. 395-408, (2014)