Students' perceptions of teaching and social presence: A comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments

被引：82

作者：

Bowers, James ^{[1
]}

Kumar, Poonam ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Criminal Justice, Saginaw Valley State University, University Center, MI

[2] Saginaw Valley State University, University Center, MI

来源：

International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies | 2015年 / 10卷 / 01期

关键词：

Community of inquiry framework; Online learning; Social presence; Student perceptions; Teaching presence;

D O I：

10.4018/ijwltt.2015010103

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Online learning has grown dramatically over the past few years and has become an integral part of most of the higher education institutions' overall strategy. While this explosive growth has created exciting opportunities for both institutions and students, high dropout rates in online learning environments continues to be a major concern for all institutions. Research has identified lack of social and teacher presence in online courses as major factors leading to student attrition. While it is easy to establish these presences in traditional classrooms, developing them in an online environment could be challenging due to absence of any face-to-face contact. The purpose of this preliminary study is to compare students' perceptions of social and teacher presences in online and traditional classroom. Thirty-four students enrolled in an online section and 29 students enrolled in a face-to-face section of an undergraduate course participated in the study. The results indicate that students' perceived stronger teacher and social presences in the online section compared to the face-to-face section. Implications of these results for practice and research are discussed. Copyright © 2015, IGI Global.

引用

页码：27 / 44

页数：17

共 42 条

[1]

Akyol Z., Garrison D., Ozden M., Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptual differences, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10, 6, pp. 183-190, (2009)

[2]

Allen I., Seaman J., Going the Distance: Online Education in the U.S.A., (2011)

[3]

Anderson T., Rourke L., Garrison R., Archer W., Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5, 2, pp. 1-17, (2001)

[4]

Angelino L., Williams F., Natvig D., Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates, Journal of Educators Online, 4, 2, pp. 1-14, (2007)

[5]

Annand D., Social presence within the community of inquiry framework, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 5, pp. 38-54, (2011)

[6]

Arbaugh J., An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11, 1, pp. 73-84, (2007)

[7]

Arbaugh J., Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcmes in online MBA courses?, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9, 2, pp. 1-21, (2008)

[8]

Arbaugh J., Cleveland-Innes M., Diaz S., Garrison D., Ice P., Richardson J.C., Swan K.P., Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample, The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 3-4, pp. 133-136, (2008)

[9]

Bali M., MOOC Pedagogy: Gleaning Good Practice from Existing MOOCs, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10, 1, pp. 44-56, (2014)

[10]

Bodomo A., Strategies for enhancing and evaluating interactivity in web-based learning and teaching, International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 5, 4, pp. 18-43, (2010)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →