Hybrid high-resolution RBF-ENO method

被引:1
作者
Hesthaven J.S. [1 ]
Mönkeberg F. [1 ]
机构
[1] SB-MATH-MCSS, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne
来源
Journal of Computational Physics: X | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
Conical aerospike nozzle; ENO reconstruction; Finite volume method; Hybrid grids; Positivity preserving method; Radial basis functions;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcpx.2021.100089
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Essentially nonoscillatory (ENO) and weighted ENO (WENO) methods on equidistant Cartesian grids are widely used to solve partial differential equations with discontinuous solutions. The RBF-ENO method is highly flexible in terms of geometry, but its stencil selection algorithm is computational expensive. In this work, we combine the computationally efficient WENO method and the geometrically flexible RBF-ENO method in a hybrid high-resolution essentially nonoscillatory method to solve hyperbolic conservation laws. The scheme is based on overlapping patches with ghost cells, the RBF-ENO method for unstructured patches and a standard WENO method on structured patches. Furthermore, we introduce a positivity preserving limiter for non-polynomial reconstruction methods to stabilize the hybrid RBF-ENO method for problems with low density or pressure. We show its robustness and flexibility on benchmarks and complex test cases such as the scramjet inflow problem and a conical aerospike nozzle jet simulation. © 2021 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 59 条
[31]  
Zhang X., Shu C.-W., Maximum-principle-satisfying and positivity-preserving high-order schemes for conservation laws: survey and new developments, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. A, Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 467, pp. 2752-2776, (2011)
[32]  
Zhang X., Xia Y., Shu C.-W., Maximum-principle-satisfying and positivity-preserving high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes for conservation laws on triangular meshes, J. Sci. Comput., 50, pp. 29-62, (2012)
[33]  
Zhang X., Shu C.-W., On positivity-preserving high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes for compressible Euler equations on rectangular meshes, J. Comput. Phys., 229, pp. 8918-8934, (2010)
[34]  
Woodward P., Colella P., The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks, J. Comput. Phys., 54, pp. 115-173, (1984)
[35]  
Geuzaine C., Remacle J., Gmsh: a 3-d finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 79, pp. 1309-1331, (2009)
[36]  
Bisson F., Nadarajah S., Shi-Dong D., Adjoint-based aerodynamic optimization of benchmark problems, 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, (2014)
[37]  
Edwards C., Small W., Weidner J., Johnston P., Studies of scramjet/airframe integration techniques for hypersonic aircraft, 13th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, (1975)
[38]  
Segal C., The Scramjet Engine: Processes and Characteristics, Vol. 25, (2009)
[39]  
El-Sayed A.F., Fundamentals of Aircraft and Rocket Propulsion, (2016)
[40]  
Kumar A., Numerical analysis of the scramjet inlet flow field using two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations, 19th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, (1981)